File core.ts
has 766 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export {
Format,
FormatDefinition,
AsyncFormatDefinition,
KeywordDefinition,
Ajv
has 24 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default class Ajv {
opts: InstanceOptions
errors?: ErrorObject[] | null // errors from the last validation
logger: Logger
// shared external scope values for compiled functions
Function compileAsync
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
compileAsync<T = unknown>(
schema: AnySchemaObject,
meta?: boolean
): Promise<AnyValidateFunction<T>> {
if (typeof this.opts.loadSchema != "function") {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function compileAsync
has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
compileAsync<T = unknown>(
schema: AnySchemaObject,
meta?: boolean
): Promise<AnyValidateFunction<T>> {
if (typeof this.opts.loadSchema != "function") {
Function $dataMetaSchema
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
$dataMetaSchema(metaSchema: AnySchemaObject, keywordsJsonPointers: string[]): AnySchemaObject {
const rules = this.RULES.all
metaSchema = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(metaSchema))
for (const jsonPointer of keywordsJsonPointers) {
const segments = jsonPointer.split("/").slice(1) // first segment is an empty string
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _addSchema
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
_addSchema(
schema: AnySchema,
meta?: boolean,
baseId?: string,
validateSchema = this.opts.validateSchema,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function addKeyword
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
addKeyword(
kwdOrDef: string | KeywordDefinition,
def?: KeywordDefinition // deprecated
): Ajv {
let keyword: string | string[]
Function removeSchema
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
removeSchema(schemaKeyRef?: AnySchema | string | RegExp): Ajv {
if (schemaKeyRef instanceof RegExp) {
this._removeAllSchemas(this.schemas, schemaKeyRef)
this._removeAllSchemas(this.refs, schemaKeyRef)
return this
Function addKeyword
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
addKeyword(
kwdOrDef: string | KeywordDefinition,
def?: KeywordDefinition // deprecated
): Ajv {
let keyword: string | string[]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function validateSchema
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
validateSchema(schema: AnySchema, throwOrLogError?: boolean): boolean | Promise<unknown> {
if (typeof schema == "boolean") return true
let $schema: string | AnySchemaObject | undefined
$schema = schema.$schema
if ($schema !== undefined && typeof $schema != "string") {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _removeAllSchemas
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private _removeAllSchemas(schemas: {[Ref in string]?: SchemaEnv | string}, regex?: RegExp): void {
for (const keyRef in schemas) {
const sch = schemas[keyRef]
if (!regex || regex.test(keyRef)) {
if (typeof sch == "string") {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function addSchema
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
addSchema(
schema: AnySchema | AnySchema[], // If array is passed, `key` will be ignored
key?: string, // Optional schema key. Can be passed to `validate` method instead of schema object or id/ref. One schema per instance can have empty `id` and `key`.
_meta?: boolean, // true if schema is a meta-schema. Used internally, addMetaSchema should be used instead.
_validateSchema = this.opts.validateSchema // false to skip schema validation. Used internally, option validateSchema should be used instead.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function checkOptions
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
this: Ajv,
checkOpts: OptionsInfo<RemovedOptions | DeprecatedOptions>,
options: Options & RemovedOptions,
msg: string,
log: "warn" | "error" = "error"
Function addRule
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function addRule(
this: Ajv,
keyword: string,
definition?: AddedKeywordDefinition,
dataType?: JSONType
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function removeSchema
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
removeSchema(schemaKeyRef?: AnySchema | string | RegExp): Ajv {
if (schemaKeyRef instanceof RegExp) {
this._removeAllSchemas(this.schemas, schemaKeyRef)
this._removeAllSchemas(this.refs, schemaKeyRef)
return this
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
export {
Format,
FormatDefinition,
AsyncFormatDefinition,
KeywordDefinition,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 99.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76