File StatsVotesRepository.php
has 340 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Invalid
<?php
// SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2023 /kbin contributors <https://kbin.pub/>
//
// SPDX-License-Identifier: AGPL-3.0-only
Function aggregateStats
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private function aggregateStats(?Magazine $magazine, string $interval, ?\DateTime $end): array
{
if (null === $end) {
$end = new \DateTime();
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method aggregateStats
has 67 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private function aggregateStats(?Magazine $magazine, string $interval, ?\DateTime $end): array
{
if (null === $end) {
$end = new \DateTime();
}
Function aggregateTotalStats
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private function aggregateTotalStats(?Magazine $magazine): array
{
$conn = $this->getEntityManager()->getConnection();
$results = [];
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function prepareContentOverall
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Wontfix
protected function prepareContentOverall(array $entries, int $startYear, int $startMonth): array
{
$currentMonth = (int) (new \DateTime('now'))->format('n');
$currentYear = (int) (new \DateTime('now'))->format('Y');
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method aggregateTotalStats
has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private function aggregateTotalStats(?Magazine $magazine): array
{
$conn = $this->getEntityManager()->getConnection();
$results = [];
Method getOverallStats
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Wontfix
#[ArrayShape(['entries' => 'array', 'comments' => 'array', 'posts' => 'array', 'replies' => 'array'])]
public function getOverallStats(
User $user = null,
Magazine $magazine = null,
bool $onlyLocal = null
Method getDailyStats
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private function getDailyStats(string $table, string $relation = null): array
{
$conn = $this->getEntityManager()
->getConnection();
Method getMonthlyStats
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private function getMonthlyStats(string $table, string $relation = null): array
{
$conn = $this->getEntityManager()
->getConnection();
Method getStats
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
?Magazine $magazine,
string $intervalStr,
?\DateTime $start,
?\DateTime $end,
?bool $onlyLocal
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
return [
'entries' => $this->prepareContentOverall(
$this->sort($entries),
$startDate[0]['year'],
$startDate[0]['month']
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 160.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public function getStats(
?Magazine $magazine,
string $intervalStr,
?\DateTime $start,
?\DateTime $end,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 146.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ($this->user) {
$sql = "SELECT date_trunc('day', e.created_at) as day, COUNT(case e.choice when 1 then 1 else null end) as up,
COUNT(case e.choice when -1 then 1 else null end) as down FROM ".$table.' e
WHERE e.created_at >= :startDate AND e.user_id = :userId
'.$onlyLocalWhere.'
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 114.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ($this->user) {
$sql = "SELECT to_char(e.created_at,'Mon') as month, extract(year from e.created_at) as year,
COUNT(case e.choice when 1 then 1 else null end) as up, COUNT(case e.choice when -1 then 1 else null end) as down FROM ".$table.'
e WHERE e.user_id = :userId '.$onlyLocalWhere.' GROUP BY 1,2';
} elseif ($this->magazine) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 114.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76