Showing 130 of 130 total issues
Module has too many lines. [112/100] Open
module Server
# Asynchronously rewrite the append-only file.
# @see https://redis.io/commands/bgrewriteaof
#
# @return [String] always 'OK'
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length a module exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Method has too many lines. [28/10] Open
def parse(io)
line = io.gets(TERMINATOR)
case line[0]
when SIMPLE_STRING
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Method has too many lines. [23/10] Open
def client_kill(opts_or_addr = {})
if opts_or_addr.is_a?(String)
run(:CLIENT, :KILL, opts_or_addr)
else
args = [:CLIENT, :KILL]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Assignment Branch Condition size for parse is too high. [24.49/15] Open
def parse(io)
line = io.gets(TERMINATOR)
case line[0]
when SIMPLE_STRING
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Cyclomatic complexity for parse is too high. [11/6] Open
def parse(io)
line = io.gets(TERMINATOR)
case line[0]
when SIMPLE_STRING
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Method has too many lines. [15/10] Open
def build_command(command = nil, *args)
return EMPTY_ARRAY_RESPONSE if command.nil?
result = append!(command, COMMAND_HEADER.dup)
size = 1
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Method has too many lines. [15/10] Open
def add_georadius_opts!(args, opts)
args << :WITHCOORD if opts[:withcoord]
args << :WITHDIST if opts[:withdist]
args << :WITHHASH if opts[:withhash]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Assignment Branch Condition size for client_kill is too high. [18.81/15] Open
def client_kill(opts_or_addr = {})
if opts_or_addr.is_a?(String)
run(:CLIENT, :KILL, opts_or_addr)
else
args = [:CLIENT, :KILL]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Cyclomatic complexity for add_georadius_opts! is too high. [8/6] Open
def add_georadius_opts!(args, opts)
args << :WITHCOORD if opts[:withcoord]
args << :WITHDIST if opts[:withdist]
args << :WITHHASH if opts[:withhash]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Cyclomatic complexity for client_kill is too high. [8/6] Open
def client_kill(opts_or_addr = {})
if opts_or_addr.is_a?(String)
run(:CLIENT, :KILL, opts_or_addr)
else
args = [:CLIENT, :KILL]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Perceived complexity for client_kill is too high. [8/7] Open
def client_kill(opts_or_addr = {})
if opts_or_addr.is_a?(String)
run(:CLIENT, :KILL, opts_or_addr)
else
args = [:CLIENT, :KILL]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the
complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that
reason it considers when
nodes as something that doesn't add as much
complexity as an if
or a &&
. Except if it's one of those special
case
/when
constructs where there's no expression after case
. Then
the cop treats it as an if
/elsif
/elsif
... and lets all the when
nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop
considers else
nodes as adding complexity.
Example:
def my_method # 1
if cond # 1
case var # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
when 1 then func_one
when 2 then func_two
when 3 then func_three
when 4..10 then func_other
end
else # 1
do_something until a && b # 2
end # ===
end # 7 complexity points
Perceived complexity for add_georadius_opts! is too high. [8/7] Open
def add_georadius_opts!(args, opts)
args << :WITHCOORD if opts[:withcoord]
args << :WITHDIST if opts[:withdist]
args << :WITHHASH if opts[:withhash]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the
complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that
reason it considers when
nodes as something that doesn't add as much
complexity as an if
or a &&
. Except if it's one of those special
case
/when
constructs where there's no expression after case
. Then
the cop treats it as an if
/elsif
/elsif
... and lets all the when
nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop
considers else
nodes as adding complexity.
Example:
def my_method # 1
if cond # 1
case var # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
when 1 then func_one
when 2 then func_two
when 3 then func_three
when 4..10 then func_other
end
else # 1
do_something until a && b # 2
end # ===
end # 7 complexity points
Assignment Branch Condition size for add_georadius_opts! is too high. [16.16/15] Open
def add_georadius_opts!(args, opts)
args << :WITHCOORD if opts[:withcoord]
args << :WITHDIST if opts[:withdist]
args << :WITHHASH if opts[:withhash]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Method client_kill
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def client_kill(opts_or_addr = {})
if opts_or_addr.is_a?(String)
run(:CLIENT, :KILL, opts_or_addr)
else
args = [:CLIENT, :KILL]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse(io)
line = io.gets(TERMINATOR)
case line[0]
when SIMPLE_STRING
Method parse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse(io)
line = io.gets(TERMINATOR)
case line[0]
when SIMPLE_STRING
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method georadius
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def georadius(key, longitude, latitude, radius, unit, opts = {})
Method georadiusbymember
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def georadiusbymember(key, member, radius, unit, opts = {})
Method common_range
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def common_range(command_name, key, start, stop, opts)
Method common_rangebyscore
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def common_rangebyscore(command_name, key, min, max, opts)