Function backfill
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function backfill($start_date, $end_date, $max_jobs=5) {
Logger::info('Scheduler backfill run', ['start' => $start_date, 'end' => $end_date], self::LOG_NAMESPACE);
cli_set_process_title('411] Backfill');
print "[+] Backfill: $start_date to $end_date\n";
$timer = new Timer();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method processSite
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function processSite($site, $date, $backfill) {
Logger::info('Process site', ['id' => $site['id'], 'date' => $date, 'backfill' => $backfill], self::LOG_NAMESPACE);
$base_title = sprintf('411] Time: %d Site: %d', $date, $site['id']);
cli_set_process_title($base_title);
$timer = new Timer();
Method backfill
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function backfill($start_date, $end_date, $max_jobs=5) {
Logger::info('Scheduler backfill run', ['start' => $start_date, 'end' => $end_date], self::LOG_NAMESPACE);
cli_set_process_title('411] Backfill');
print "[+] Backfill: $start_date to $end_date\n";
$timer = new Timer();
Function process
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function process($date, $backfill) {
Logger::info('Scheduler run', ['time' => $date], self::LOG_NAMESPACE);
cli_set_process_title('411] Scheduler');
print "[+] Scheduler: $date\n";
$timer = new Timer();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method process
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function process($date, $backfill) {
Logger::info('Scheduler run', ['time' => $date], self::LOG_NAMESPACE);
cli_set_process_title('411] Scheduler');
print "[+] Scheduler: $date\n";
$timer = new Timer();
Function health
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private function health($date) {
$search_health = [];
$cfg = new DBConfig;
$meta = new DBMeta;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function processSearches
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private function processSearches($date, $search_health, $backfill) {
foreach(SearchFinder::getByQuery(['enabled' => 1]) as $search) {
// If the search doesn't need to run OR
// the search type is failing and isn't time based
// skip it!
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function processSite
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function processSite($site, $date, $backfill) {
Logger::info('Process site', ['id' => $site['id'], 'date' => $date, 'backfill' => $backfill], self::LOG_NAMESPACE);
$base_title = sprintf('411] Time: %d Site: %d', $date, $site['id']);
cli_set_process_title($base_title);
$timer = new Timer();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if(is_null($lastjob) || $date - $lastjob['target_date'] >= 1 * 60 * 60 - 5) {
$rollupjob = new Rollup_Job();
$rollupjob['target_id'] = Rollup_Job::I_HOURLY;
$rollupjob['target_date'] = $date;
$rollupjob->store();
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 111.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if(is_null($lastjob) || $date - $lastjob['target_date'] >= 24 * 60 * 60 - 5) {
$rollupjob = new Rollup_Job();
$rollupjob['target_id'] = Rollup_Job::I_DAILY;
$rollupjob['target_date'] = $date;
$rollupjob->store();
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 111.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private function processAutoclose($date, $backfill) {
// Run hourly.
$lastjob = JobFinder::getLastByQuery(['type' => Autoclose_Job::$TYPE]);
if(is_null($lastjob) || $date - $lastjob['target_date'] >= 1 * 60 * 60 - 5) {
$autoclosejob = new Autoclose_Job();
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 92.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private function processCleanup($date) {
// Run daily.
$lastjob = JobFinder::getLastByQuery(['type' => Cleanup_Job::$TYPE]);
if(is_null($lastjob) || $date - $lastjob['target_date'] >= 24 * 60 * 60 - 5) {
$cleanupjob = new Cleanup_Job();
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 92.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76