Method getAnalyzeFunctionCallClosures
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function getAnalyzeFunctionCallClosures(CodeBase $code_base): array
{
/**
* @return Closure(CodeBase,Context,Func,array):void
*/
Method visitBinaryOp
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function visitBinaryOp(Node $node): void
{
switch ($node->flags) {
case ast\flags\BINARY_IS_EQUAL:
case ast\flags\BINARY_IS_NOT_EQUAL:
The method visitBinaryOp() has a Cyclomatic Complexity of 10. The configured cyclomatic complexity threshold is 10. Open
public function visitBinaryOp(Node $node): void
{
switch ($node->flags) {
case ast\flags\BINARY_IS_EQUAL:
case ast\flags\BINARY_IS_NOT_EQUAL:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
CyclomaticComplexity
Since: 0.1
Complexity is determined by the number of decision points in a method plus one for the method entry. The decision points are 'if', 'while', 'for', and 'case labels'. Generally, 1-4 is low complexity, 5-7 indicates moderate complexity, 8-10 is high complexity, and 11+ is very high complexity.
Example
// Cyclomatic Complexity = 11
class Foo {
1 public function example() {
2 if ($a == $b) {
3 if ($a1 == $b1) {
fiddle();
4 } elseif ($a2 == $b2) {
fiddle();
} else {
fiddle();
}
5 } elseif ($c == $d) {
6 while ($c == $d) {
fiddle();
}
7 } elseif ($e == $f) {
8 for ($n = 0; $n < $h; $n++) {
fiddle();
}
} else {
switch ($z) {
9 case 1:
fiddle();
break;
10 case 2:
fiddle();
break;
11 case 3:
fiddle();
break;
default:
fiddle();
break;
}
}
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/codesize.html#cyclomaticcomplexity
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case ast\flags\BINARY_SPACESHIP:
if ($this->bothSidesArePossiblyObjects($node)) {
$this->emit(
StrictComparisonPlugin::ComparisonObjectOrdering,
'Using comparison operator on possible object types {TYPE} and {TYPE} in {CODE}',
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 100.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case ast\flags\BINARY_IS_NOT_EQUAL:
if ($this->bothSidesArePossiblyObjects($node)) {
// TODO: Also check arrays of objects?
$this->emit(
StrictComparisonPlugin::ComparisonObjectEqualityNotStrict,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 100.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Constant ComparisonObjectEqualityNotStrict should be defined in uppercase Open
public const ComparisonObjectEqualityNotStrict = 'PhanPluginComparisonObjectEqualityNotStrict';
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
ConstantNamingConventions
Since: 0.2
Class/Interface constant names should always be defined in uppercase.
Example
class Foo {
const MY_NUM = 0; // ok
const myTest = ""; // fail
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/naming.html#constantnamingconventions
Constant ComparisonObjectOrdering should be defined in uppercase Open
public const ComparisonObjectOrdering = 'PhanPluginComparisonObjectOrdering';
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
ConstantNamingConventions
Since: 0.2
Class/Interface constant names should always be defined in uppercase.
Example
class Foo {
const MY_NUM = 0; // ok
const myTest = ""; // fail
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/naming.html#constantnamingconventions
Constant ComparisonNotStrictInCall should be defined in uppercase Open
public const ComparisonNotStrictInCall = 'PhanPluginComparisonNotStrictInCall';
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
ConstantNamingConventions
Since: 0.2
Class/Interface constant names should always be defined in uppercase.
Example
class Foo {
const MY_NUM = 0; // ok
const myTest = ""; // fail
}