fabiommendes/sidekick

View on GitHub
sidekick-functions/sidekick/functions/lib_composition.py

Summary

Maintainability
A
3 hrs
Test Coverage

Function juxt has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def juxt(*funcs: Callable, first=None, last=None) -> fn:
    """
    Juxtapose several functions.

    Creates a function that calls several functions with the same arguments and
Severity: Minor
Found in sidekick-functions/sidekick/functions/lib_composition.py - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function rthread_if has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def rthread_if(data, *forms):
    """
    Similar to rthread, but each form must be a tuple with (test, fn, ...args)
    and only pass the argument to fn if the boolean test is True.

Severity: Minor
Found in sidekick-functions/sidekick/functions/lib_composition.py - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function thread_if has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def thread_if(data, *forms):
    """
    Similar to thread, but each form must be a tuple with (test, fn, ...args)
    and only pass the argument to fn if the boolean test is True.

Severity: Minor
Found in sidekick-functions/sidekick/functions/lib_composition.py - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Avoid too many return statements within this function.
Open

    return fn(_juxt(*funcs))
Severity: Major
Found in sidekick-functions/sidekick/functions/lib_composition.py - About 30 mins to fix

    There are no issues that match your filters.

    Category
    Status