failmap/admin

View on GitHub
websecmap/scanners/impact.py

Summary

Maintainability
B
6 hrs
Test Coverage

Function calculate_impact has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def calculate_impact():
    """
    Based on scans: the first and the last measurement, calculates numbers on how much has changed. It takes
    into account how much endpoints / urls are deleted. This script is slow, but also simple. This simplicty
    makes it easy to understand and maintain.
Severity: Minor
Found in websecmap/scanners/impact.py - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function calculate_impact. (13)
Open

def calculate_impact():
    """
    Based on scans: the first and the last measurement, calculates numbers on how much has changed. It takes
    into account how much endpoints / urls are deleted. This script is slow, but also simple. This simplicty
    makes it easy to understand and maintain.
Severity: Minor
Found in websecmap/scanners/impact.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function is_improved. (9)
Open

def is_improved(first_scan, last_scan):
    if first_scan == "high":
        return True if last_scan in ["medium", "low", "good"] else False
    if first_scan == "medium":
        return True if last_scan in ["low", "good"] else False
Severity: Minor
Found in websecmap/scanners/impact.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Function is_improved has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def is_improved(first_scan, last_scan):
    if first_scan == "high":
        return True if last_scan in ["medium", "low", "good"] else False
    if first_scan == "medium":
        return True if last_scan in ["low", "good"] else False
Severity: Minor
Found in websecmap/scanners/impact.py - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function get_impact has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def get_impact(severity):
    if severity["is_explained"]:
        return "good"
    return "high" if severity["high"] else "medium" if severity["medium"] else "low" if severity["low"] else "good"

Severity: Minor
Found in websecmap/scanners/impact.py - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Avoid too many return statements within this function.
Open

        return True
Severity: Major
Found in websecmap/scanners/impact.py - About 30 mins to fix

    There are no issues that match your filters.

    Category
    Status