fbredius/storybook

View on GitHub
examples/react-ts/src/AccountForm.stories.tsx

Summary

Maintainability
B
4 hrs
Test Coverage

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

export const StandardPasswordFailed = {
  ...Standard,
  play: async () => {
    await StandardEmailFilled.play();
    await userEvent.type(screen.getByTestId('password1'), 'asdf');
Severity: Major
Found in examples/react-ts/src/AccountForm.stories.tsx and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
examples/react-ts/src/AccountForm.stories.tsx on lines 64..71

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 79.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

export const VerificationPasssword1 = {
  ...Verification,
  play: async () => {
    await StandardEmailFilled.play();
    await userEvent.type(screen.getByTestId('password1'), 'asdfasdf');
Severity: Major
Found in examples/react-ts/src/AccountForm.stories.tsx and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
examples/react-ts/src/AccountForm.stories.tsx on lines 42..49

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 79.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Type assertion on object literals is forbidden, use a type annotation instead.
Open

export default {
  // Title not needed due to CSF3 auto-title
  // title: 'Demo/AccountForm',
  component: AccountForm,
  parameters: {

Rule: no-object-literal-type-assertion

Forbids an object literal to appear in a type assertion expression. Casting to any or to unknown is still allowed.

Rationale

Always prefer const x: T = { ... }; to const x = { ... } as T;. The type assertion in the latter case is either unnecessary or hides an error. The compiler will warn for excess properties with this syntax, but not missing required fields. For example: const x: { foo: number } = {} will fail to compile, but const x = {} as { foo: number } will succeed. Additionally, the const assertion const x = { foo: 1 } as const, introduced in TypeScript 3.4, is considered beneficial and is ignored by this rule.

Notes
  • TypeScript Only

Config

One option may be configured:

  • allow-arguments allows type assertions to be used on object literals inside call expressions.
Examples
"no-object-literal-type-assertion": true
"no-object-literal-type-assertion": true,[object Object]
Schema
{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "allow-arguments": {
      "type": "boolean"
    }
  },
  "additionalProperties": false
}

For more information see this page.

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status