Function storySort
has a Cognitive Complexity of 57 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
(options: StorySortObjectParameter = {}): StorySortComparatorV7 =>
(a: StoryIndexEntry, b: StoryIndexEntry): number => {
// If the two stories have the same story kind, then use the default
// ordering, which is the order they are defined in the story file.
// only when includeNames is falsy
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function storySort
has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
(a: StoryIndexEntry, b: StoryIndexEntry): number => {
// If the two stories have the same story kind, then use the default
// ordering, which is the order they are defined in the story file.
// only when includeNames is falsy
if (a.title === b.title && !options.includeNames) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (indexWildcard !== -1) {
indexB = indexWildcard;
} else {
indexB = order.length;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (indexWildcard !== -1) {
indexA = indexWildcard;
} else {
indexA = order.length;
}
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return 0;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return 0;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return nameA.localeCompare(nameB, options.locales ? options.locales : undefined, {
numeric: true,
sensitivity: 'accent',
});
Use a conditional expression instead of assigning to 'indexA' in multiple places. Open
if (indexWildcard !== -1) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Rule: prefer-conditional-expression
Recommends to use a conditional expression instead of assigning to the same thing in each branch of an if statement.
Rationale
This reduces duplication and can eliminate an unnecessary variable declaration.
Config
If check-else-if
is specified, the rule also checks nested if-else-if statements.
Examples
"prefer-conditional-expression": true
"prefer-conditional-expression": true,check-else-if
Schema
{
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"check-else-if"
]
}
For more information see this page.
Use a conditional expression instead of assigning to 'indexB' in multiple places. Open
if (indexWildcard !== -1) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Rule: prefer-conditional-expression
Recommends to use a conditional expression instead of assigning to the same thing in each branch of an if statement.
Rationale
This reduces duplication and can eliminate an unnecessary variable declaration.
Config
If check-else-if
is specified, the rule also checks nested if-else-if statements.
Examples
"prefer-conditional-expression": true
"prefer-conditional-expression": true,check-else-if
Schema
{
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"check-else-if"
]
}
For more information see this page.