File fgraphql.ts
has 354 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import type { Application, HookContext, Query } from '@feathersjs/feathers';
import makeDebug from 'debug';
import type { parse, GraphQLFieldResolver } from 'graphql';
import type { SyncContextFunction } from '../types';
import { getItems } from '../utils/get-items';
Function fgraphql
has 85 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function fgraphql<H extends HookContext = HookContext>(options1: FGraphQLHookOptions<H>) {
debug('init call');
const { parse, recordType, resolvers, runTime, query } = options1;
let { schema } = options1;
Function processRecord
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function processRecord(store: any, query: any, depth: any, rec: any, type: any, j: any): any {
debug(`processRecord rec# ${j} typeof ${typeof rec} Type ${type}`);
if (!rec) return; // Catch any null values from resolvers.
const queryPropNames = Object.keys(query);
Function processRecordFieldResolver
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function processRecordFieldResolver(
store: any,
query: any,
depth: any,
rec: any,
Function processRecordQuery
has 10 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
store: any,
query: any,
depth: any,
rec: any,
fieldName: any,
Function fgraphql
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function fgraphql<H extends HookContext = HookContext>(options1: FGraphQLHookOptions<H>) {
debug('init call');
const { parse, recordType, resolvers, runTime, query } = options1;
let { schema } = options1;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function convertResolverResult
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function convertResolverResult(result: any, ourQuery: any, fieldName: any, type: any) {
if (result === null || result === undefined) {
return ourQuery.listType ? [] : null;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function processRecordFieldResolver
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
store: any,
query: any,
depth: any,
rec: any,
fieldName: any,
Function convertFieldDefinitionType
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function convertFieldDefinitionType(fieldDefinitionType: any, errDesc: any, converted?: any): any {
converted = converted || {
nonNullTypeList: false,
listType: false,
nonNullTypeField: false,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function processRecord
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function processRecord(store: any, query: any, depth: any, rec: any, type: any, j: any): any {
Function processRecords
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function processRecords(store: any, query: any, recs: any, type: any, depth = 0): any {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (definition.kind !== 'ObjectTypeDefinition' || !isArray(definition.fields)) {
throw new Error(`Type# ${definitionIndex} is not a valid ObjectTypeDefinition`);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 45.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (field.kind !== 'FieldDefinition' || !isObject(field.type)) {
throw new Error(`${errDesc} is not a valid ObjectTypeDefinition`);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 45.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76