feathersjs/feathers-profiler

View on GitHub

Showing 9 of 9 total issues

Function services has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

function services () {
  this.use('/messages', {
    before: {
      all: () => {},
      create: [
Severity: Minor
Found in example/app.js - About 2 hrs to fix

    Function getProfile has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    export function getProfile () {
      debug('Get timings');
    
      if (options.stats !== 'none') {
        Object.keys(cache).forEach(route => {
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/index.js - About 1 hr to fix

      Function profiler has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      export function profiler (options1 = {}) {
        options = Object.assign({}, {
          logger: { log: msg => console.log(msg) },
          logMsg: defaultLogMsg,
          stats: 'total',
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/index.js - About 1 hr to fix

        Function timeEnd has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        export function timeEnd (hook) {
          if (!hook._log || !hook._log.hrtime) {
            return; // ignore RethinkDB change-feed
          }
        
        
        Severity: Minor
        Found in src/index.js - About 1 hr to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Function timeEnd has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        export function timeEnd (hook) {
          if (!hook._log || !hook._log.hrtime) {
            return; // ignore RethinkDB change-feed
          }
        
        
        Severity: Minor
        Found in src/index.js - About 1 hr to fix

          Function services has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

          function services () {
            this.use('/messages', {
              before: {
                all: () => {},
                create: [
          Severity: Minor
          Found in example/app.js - About 45 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

            service.create({ throwBefore: true }, { query: { throwBefore: true } }) // throw before
              .catch(() => {}),
          Severity: Minor
          Found in example/app.js and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
          example/app.js on lines 76..77

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 45.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

            service.create({ throwAfter: true }, { query: { throwAfter: true } }) // throw after
              .catch(() => {}),
          Severity: Minor
          Found in example/app.js and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
          example/app.js on lines 72..73

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 45.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Function profiler has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

          export function profiler (options1 = {}) {
            options = Object.assign({}, {
              logger: { log: msg => console.log(msg) },
              logMsg: defaultLogMsg,
              stats: 'total',
          Severity: Minor
          Found in src/index.js - About 25 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Severity
          Category
          Status
          Source
          Language