Function subaward_filter
has a Cognitive Complexity of 132 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def subaward_filter(filters, for_downloads=False):
queryset = SubawardSearch.objects.all()
recipient_scope_q = Q(sub_legal_entity_country_code="USA") | Q(sub_legal_entity_country_name="UNITED STATES")
pop_scope_q = Q(sub_place_of_perform_country_co="USA") | Q(sub_place_of_perform_country_name="UNITED STATES")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function subaward_filter. (59) Open
def subaward_filter(filters, for_downloads=False):
queryset = SubawardSearch.objects.all()
recipient_scope_q = Q(sub_legal_entity_country_code="USA") | Q(sub_legal_entity_country_name="UNITED STATES")
pop_scope_q = Q(sub_place_of_perform_country_co="USA") | Q(sub_place_of_perform_country_name="UNITED STATES")
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.
Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:
Construct | Effect on CC | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
if | +1 | An if statement is a single decision. |
elif | +1 | The elif statement adds another decision. |
else | +0 | The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if. |
for | +1 | There is a decision at the start of the loop. |
while | +1 | There is a decision at the while statement. |
except | +1 | Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution. |
finally | +0 | The finally block is unconditionally executed. |
with | +1 | The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details). |
assert | +1 | The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement. |
Comprehension | +1 | A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop. |
Boolean Operator | +1 | Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point. |
File sub_award.py
has 275 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Wontfix
import itertools
import logging
from django.db.models import Exists, OuterRef, Q
Function geocode_filter_subaward_locations
has a Cognitive Complexity of 29 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring. Wontfix
def geocode_filter_subaward_locations(scope: str, values: list) -> Q:
"""
Function filter querysets for location data in subawards
scope- place of performance or recipient location mappings
values- array of location requests
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Wontfix
if "toptier_name" in v:
funding_subtier |= Q(funding_subtier_agency_name=name) & Q(
funding_toptier_agency_name=v["toptier_name"]
)
else:
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Wontfix
if "toptier_name" in v:
awarding_subtier |= Q(awarding_subtier_agency_name=name) & Q(
awarding_toptier_agency_name=v["toptier_name"]
)
else: