Showing 153 of 153 total issues
json Gem for Ruby Unsafe Object Creation Vulnerability (additional fix) Open
json (1.8.3)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2020-10663
Criticality: High
URL: https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2020/03/19/json-dos-cve-2020-10663/
Solution: upgrade to >= 2.3.0
ReDoS based DoS vulnerability in Active Support’s underscore Open
activesupport (4.2.7.1)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2023-22796
URL: https://github.com/rails/rails/releases/tag/v7.0.4.1
Solution: upgrade to >= 5.2.8.15, ~> 5.2.8, >= 6.1.7.1, ~> 6.1.7, >= 7.0.4.1
Potentially unintended unmarshalling of user-provided objects in MemCacheStore and RedisCacheStore Open
activesupport (4.2.7.1)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2020-8165
Criticality: Critical
URL: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rubyonrails-security/bv6fW4S0Y1c
Solution: upgrade to >= 5.2.4.3, ~> 5.2.4, >= 6.0.3.1
OS Command Injection in Rake Open
rake (10.5.0)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2020-8130
Criticality: High
URL: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-jppv-gw3r-w3q8
Solution: upgrade to >= 12.3.3
Regular Expression Denial of Service in Addressable templates Open
addressable (2.4.0)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2021-32740
Criticality: High
URL: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-jxhc-q857-3j6g
Solution: upgrade to >= 2.8.0
Race condition when using persistent connections Open
excon (0.54.0)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2019-16779
Criticality: Medium
URL: https://github.com/excon/excon/security/advisories/GHSA-q58g-455p-8vw9
Solution: upgrade to >= 0.71.0
Improper handling of double quotes in file name in Diffy in Windows environment Open
diffy (3.1.0)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2022-33127
Criticality: Critical
URL: https://github.com/samg/diffy/commit/478f392082b66d38f54a02b4bb9c41be32fd6593
Solution: upgrade to >= 3.4.1
i18n Gem for Ruby lib/i18n/core_ext/hash.rb Hash#slice() Function Hash Handling DoS Open
i18n (0.7.0)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2014-10077
URL: https://github.com/svenfuchs/i18n/pull/289
Solution: upgrade to >= 0.8.0
Method install_users
has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def install_users(name:)
if (resp = existing_validation(name: name)).net_status_ok?
mapper = index[name].inheritance_mapper
# user / group
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method inheritors_tree
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def inheritors_tree(mapper, mux: false)
tree = {}
type = mux ? 'mux' : 'model'
m_key = mapper.name
tree[m_key] ||= {}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method _add_custom
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _add_custom(name:, group:, shell: '/usr/sbin/nologin', home_dir: "/web/#{group}", uid: nil)
debug_operation(desc: { code: :user, data: { name: name } }) do |&blk|
if _get(name: name)
blk.call(code: :ok)
{}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
module Controller
class Mysql
class Db
NAME_FORMAT = /^[a-zA-Z0-9._-]{1,64}$/
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 78.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
module Controller
class Mysql
class User
NAME_FORMAT = /^[a-zA-Z0-9._-]{1,15}$/
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 78.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method _del
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _del(name:, group:)
debug_operation(desc: { code: :user, data: { name: name } }) do |&blk|
with_dry_run do |dry_run|
resp = {}
with_adding_group = _group_get_users(name: group).one? ? true : false
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add(name:, container_name:, ftp_dir: nil, ftp_only: false, generate: false)
return { error: :logical_error, code: :option_ftp_only_is_required } if ftp_dir && !ftp_only
web_mapper = PathMapper.new("/web/#{container_name}")
home_dir = ftp_dir.nil? ? web_mapper.path : web_mapper.f(ftp_dir).path
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method _safe_run_docker
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _safe_run_docker(*docker_options, name:, restart: false)
if restart
_recreate_docker(*docker_options, name: name)
elsif @docker_api.container_running?(name)
elsif @docker_api.container_exists?(name)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method has too many lines. [40/38] Open
def install_users(name:)
if (resp = existing_validation(name: name)).net_status_ok?
mapper = index[name].inheritance_mapper
# user / group
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def _delete(name:)
container_name, _db_name = @mysql_controller.alternative_name(name: name)
index[name].each {|user_name| @mysql_controller._revoke(user_name: user_name, database_name: name) }
debug_operation(desc: { code: :mysql_database, data: { name: name } }) do |&blk|
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 69.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def _delete(name:)
container_name, _user_name = @mysql_controller.alternative_name(name: name)
index[name].each { |db_name| @mysql_controller._revoke(user_name: name, database_name: db_name) }
debug_operation(desc: { code: :mysql_user, data: { name: name } }) do |&blk|
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 69.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method reindex_container
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def reindex_container(container_name:)
self.class.index ||= {}
self.class.grant_index ||= {}
container_users(container_name: container_name).each { |k, _v| self.class.index.delete(k) }
container_grants(container_name: container_name).each { |k, _v| self.class.index.delete(k) }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"