Showing 664 of 664 total issues
Method optimized_filter_stream
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def optimized_filter_stream(tag, es)
new_es = MultiEventStream.new
es.each(unpacker: Fluent::MessagePackFactory.thread_local_msgpack_unpacker) do |time, record|
filtered_record = record
filtered_time = time
Method call
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def call(request)
method = request.method
resp =
case method
when HttpServer::Methods::GET
Method compat_parameters_inject
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def compat_parameters_inject(conf)
return unless conf.elements('inject').empty?
return if INJECT_PARAMS.keys.all?{|k| !conf.has_key?(k) }
# TODO: warn obsolete parameters if these are deprecated
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
begin
file_rename(@chunk, @path, new_chunk_path, ->(new_io) { @chunk = new_io })
rescue => e
begin
file_rename(@chunk, new_chunk_path, @path, ->(new_io) { @chunk = new_io }) if File.exist?(new_chunk_path)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
begin
file_rename(@chunk, @path, new_chunk_path, ->(new_io) { @chunk = new_io })
rescue => e
begin
file_rename(@chunk, new_chunk_path, @path, ->(new_io) { @chunk = new_io }) if File.exist?(new_chunk_path)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method purge_chunk
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def purge_chunk(chunk_id)
metadata = nil
synchronize do
chunk = @dequeued.delete(chunk_id)
return nil unless chunk # purged by other threads
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method try_connect
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def try_connect
begin
now = Time.now.to_i
unless @error_history.empty?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method update_watcher
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_watcher(tail_watcher, pe, new_inode)
# TODO we should use another callback for this.
# To supress impact to existing logics, limit the case to `@follow_inodes`.
# We may not need `@follow_inodes` condition.
if @follow_inodes && new_inode.nil?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method collect_response
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def collect_response(select_interval)
now = Fluent::Clock.now
sockets = []
results = []
begin
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_time
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_time(record)
if @time_key && record.respond_to?(:has_key?) && record.has_key?(@time_key)
src = if @keep_time_key
record[@time_key]
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method on_message
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def on_message(msg)
unless msg.is_a?(Array)
log.warn "incoming data is broken:", msg: msg
return
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method configure
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def configure(conf)
compat_parameters_convert(conf, :extract, :parser)
['parse', 'extract'].each do |subsection_name|
if subsection = conf.elements(subsection_name).first
if subsection.has_key?('time_format')
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method write
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def write(chunk)
path = extract_placeholders(@path_template, chunk)
FileUtils.mkdir_p File.dirname(path), mode: @dir_perm
writer = case
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.parse(str, fname, basepath = Dir.pwd, v1_config = nil, syntax: :v1)
parser = if fname =~ /\.rb$/ || syntax == :ruby
:ruby
elsif v1_config.nil?
case syntax
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method start
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def start
super
unless @heartbeat_type == :none
if @heartbeat_type == :udp
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method configure
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def configure(conf)
@include_time_key = false
@localtime = false
@timezone = nil
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method check_pidfile
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def check_pidfile(pid_path)
if File.exist?(pid_path)
if !File.readable?(pid_path) || !File.writable?(pid_path)
raise Fluent::ConfigError, "Cannot access pid file: #{pid_path}"
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method lookup
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.lookup(format)
# TODO: warn when deprecated to use Plugin.new_parser or RegexpParser.new directly
if format.nil?
raise ConfigError, "'format' parameter is required"
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_options
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.get_options
options = {}
DEFAULTS.each { |key, value| options[key] = value }
OPTIONS.each do |key, type|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method ignore_same_log?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def ignore_same_log?(time, message)
cached_log = Thread.current[:last_same_log]
if cached_log.nil?
Thread.current[:last_same_log] = {message => time}
return false
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"