Showing 1,218 of 1,218 total issues
Method describe_security_groups
has 64 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def describe_security_groups(filters = {})
unless filters.is_a?(Hash)
Fog::Logger.deprecation("describe_security_groups with #{filters.class} param is deprecated, use describe_security_groups('group-name' => []) instead [light_black](#{caller.first})[/]")
filters = {'group-name' => [*filters]}
end
Class Group
has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Group < Fog::Model
identity :id, :aliases => 'AutoScalingGroupName'
attribute :arn, :aliases => 'AutoScalingGroupARN'
attribute :availability_zones, :aliases => 'AvailabilityZones'
attribute :created_at, :aliases => 'CreatedTime'
Method end_element
has 62 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def end_element(name)
case name
when 'amiLaunchIndex'
@instance[name] = value.to_i
when 'architecture', 'clientToken', 'dnsName', 'hypervisor', 'imageId',
Method create_vpc
has 62 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_vpc(cidrBlock, options = {})
Excon::Response.new.tap do |response|
if cidrBlock
response.status = 200
vpc_id = Fog::AWS::Mock.vpc_id
Method create_function
has 62 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_function(params={})
response = Excon::Response.new
runtime = params.delete('Runtime') || 'nodejs'
if !%w(nodejs java8).include?(runtime)
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
module AWS
class Compute
class Real
require 'fog/aws/parsers/compute/monitor_unmonitor_instances'
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 91.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
module AWS
class Compute
class Real
require 'fog/aws/parsers/compute/monitor_unmonitor_instances'
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 91.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method end_element
has 61 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def end_element(name)
if @in_tag_set
case name
when 'item'
@nic['tagSet'][@tag['key']] = @tag['value']
Method end_element
has 61 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def end_element(name)
super
case name
when *@contexts
@context.pop
Method create_network_interface
has 61 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_network_interface(subnetId, options = {})
response = Excon::Response.new
if subnetId
subnet = self.data[:subnets].find{ |s| s['subnetId'] == subnetId }
if subnet.nil?
Method run_task
has 61 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def run_task(params={})
response = Excon::Response.new
response.status = 200
unless task_def_id = params.delete('taskDefinition')
Method save
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def save(options = {})
requires :body, :directory, :key
if options != {}
Fog::Logger.deprecation("options param is deprecated, use acl= instead [light_black](#{caller.first})[/]")
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method end_element
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def end_element(name)
if @in_outputs
case name
when 'OutputKey', 'OutputValue', 'Description'
@output[name] = value
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method modify_db_instance
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def modify_db_instance(db_name, apply_immediately, _options={})
options = _options.dup
response = Excon::Response.new
if server = self.data[:servers][db_name]
if server["DBInstanceStatus"] != "available"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method replace_route
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def replace_route(route_table_id, destination_cidr_block, options = {})
options['instanceOwnerId'] ||= nil
options['DestinationCidrBlock'] ||= destination_cidr_block
route_table = self.data[:route_tables].find { |routetable| routetable["routeTableId"].eql? route_table_id }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method put_attributes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def put_attributes(domain_name, item_name, attributes, options = {})
options[:expect] = {} unless options[:expect]
options[:replace] = [] unless options[:replace]
response = Excon::Response.new
if self.data[:domains][domain_name]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create_service
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_service(params={})
response = Excon::Response.new
response.status = 200
e = Fog::AWS::ECS::Error
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_attributes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_attributes(domain_name, item_name, options = {})
if options.is_a?(Array)
Fog::Logger.deprecation("get_attributes with array attributes param is deprecated, use 'AttributeName' => attributes) instead [light_black](#{caller.first})[/]")
options['AttributeName'] ||= options if options.is_a?(Array)
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method end_element
has 60 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def end_element(name)
case name
when 'AvailabilityZone', 'ClusterIdentifier', 'ClusterStatus', 'ClusterSubnetGroupName', 'DBName',
'MasterUsername', 'ModifyStatus', 'PreferredMaintenanceWindow', 'VpcId'
@cluster[name] = value
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(options={})
@use_iam_profile = options[:use_iam_profile]
@instrumentor = options[:instrumentor]
@instrumentor_name = options[:instrumentor_name] || 'fog.aws.rds'
@connection_options = options[:connection_options] || {}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 89.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76