lib/fog/aws/dns.rb

Summary

Maintainability
D
1 day
Test Coverage
D
62%

Method change_resource_record_sets_data has a Cognitive Complexity of 36 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def self.change_resource_record_sets_data(zone_id, change_batch, version, options = {})
        # AWS methods return zone_ids that looks like '/hostedzone/id'.  Let the caller either use
        # that form or just the actual id (which is what this request needs)
        zone_id = zone_id.sub('/hostedzone/', '')

Severity: Minor
Found in lib/fog/aws/dns.rb - About 5 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method change_resource_record_sets_data has 58 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def self.change_resource_record_sets_data(zone_id, change_batch, version, options = {})
        # AWS methods return zone_ids that looks like '/hostedzone/id'.  Let the caller either use
        # that form or just the actual id (which is what this request needs)
        zone_id = zone_id.sub('/hostedzone/', '')

Severity: Major
Found in lib/fog/aws/dns.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

    Consider simplifying this complex logical expression.
    Open

                if change_item[:alias_target]
                  # Accept either underscore or camel case for hash keys.
                  dns_name = change_item[:alias_target][:dns_name] || change_item[:alias_target][:DNSName]
                  hosted_zone_id = change_item[:alias_target][:hosted_zone_id] || change_item[:alias_target][:HostedZoneId] || AWS.hosted_zone_for_alias_target(dns_name)
                  evaluate_target_health = change_item[:alias_target][:evaluate_target_health] || change_item[:alias_target][:EvaluateTargetHealth] || false
    Severity: Major
    Found in lib/fog/aws/dns.rb - About 40 mins to fix

      Method _request has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

              def _request(params, &block)
                @connection.request(params, &block)
              rescue Excon::Errors::HTTPStatusError => error
                match = Fog::AWS::Errors.match_error(error)
      
      
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/fog/aws/dns.rb - About 35 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

              def initialize(options={})
      
                @use_iam_profile = options[:use_iam_profile]
                setup_credentials(options)
                @instrumentor       = options[:instrumentor]
      Severity: Major
      Found in lib/fog/aws/dns.rb and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
      lib/fog/aws/cdn.rb on lines 142..155

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 79.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

              def request(params, &block)
                refresh_credentials_if_expired
      
                params[:headers] ||= {}
                params[:headers]['Date'] = Fog::Time.now.to_date_header
      Severity: Major
      Found in lib/fog/aws/dns.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
      lib/fog/aws/cdn.rb on lines 173..187

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 66.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

                  raise case match[:code]
                  when 'NoSuchHostedZone', 'NoSuchChange' then
                    Fog::AWS::DNS::NotFound.slurp(error, match[:message])
                  else
                    Fog::AWS::DNS::Error.slurp(error, "#{match[:code]} => #{match[:message]}")
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/fog/aws/dns.rb and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
      lib/fog/aws/cloud_formation.rb on lines 135..139

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 34.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

              @elb_dualstack_hosted_zone_mapping ||= {
                "ap-northeast-1" => "Z14GRHDCWA56QT",
                "ap-northeast-2" => "ZWKZPGTI48KDX",
                "ap-northeast-3" => "Z5LXEXXYW11ES",
                "ap-south-1" => "ZP97RAFLXTNZK",
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/fog/aws/dns.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
      lib/fog/aws/requests/compute/describe_images.rb on lines 81..97

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 33.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      There are no issues that match your filters.

      Category
      Status