Showing 616 of 616 total issues
Method list_resources
has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def list_resources(_type = "generic", _options = {})
response = Excon::Response.new
response.status = 200
response.body = [
{
Method build_credentials
has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_credentials(auth)
if auth[:openstack_project_id] || auth[:openstack_project_name]
# project scoped
@project = Fog::OpenStack::Auth::ProjectScope.new(
auth[:openstack_project_id],
Method list_bay_models
has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def list_bay_models
response = Excon::Response.new
response.status = 200
response.body = {
"baymodels" => [
Method get_file_contents
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_file_contents(from_data, base_url)
Fog::Logger.debug("Processing #{from_data} with base_url #{base_url}")
# Recursively traverse the tree
# if recurse_data is Array or Hash
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method list_zones_detailed
has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def list_zones_detailed(_options = {})
Excon::Response.new(
:body => {
"availabilityZoneInfo" => [
{
Method list_services
has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def list_services(_parameters = nil)
response = Excon::Response.new
response.status = 200
response.body = {
"services" => [{
Method get_hypervisor
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_hypervisor(hypervisor_id)
response = Excon::Response.new
response.status = 200
response.body = {
"hypervisor" => {
Method update_snapshot
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_snapshot(snapshot_id, options = {})
unless snapshot_id
raise ArgumentError, 'snapshot_id is required'
end
response = Excon::Response.new
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method update_stack
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_stack(arg1, arg2 = nil, arg3 = nil)
if arg1.kind_of?(Stack)
# Normal use, update_stack(stack, options = {})
stack = arg1
stack_name = stack.stack_name
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
module OpenStack
class SharedFileSystem
class Real
def update_security_service(id, options = {})
request(
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 70.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
module OpenStack
class SharedFileSystem
class Real
def update_share_network(id, options = {})
request(
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 70.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
module OpenStack
class SharedFileSystem
class Real
def update_snapshot(id, options = {})
request(
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 70.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method get_metric
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_metric(_metric_id)
response = Excon::Response.new
response.status = 200
response.body = {
"archive_policy" => {
Method list_all_addresses
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def list_all_addresses(_options = {})
response = Excon::Response.new
response.status = 200
response.headers = {
"X-Compute-Request-Id" => "req-d4a21158-a86c-44a6-983a-e25645907f26",
Method auth_response_v2
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def auth_response_v2(type, name)
{
'access' => {
'token' => {
'issued_at' => '2017-12-05T10:44:31.454741Z',
Method initialize
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(options = {})
@openstack_username = options[:openstack_username] || 'admin'
@openstack_tenant = options[:openstack_tenant] || 'admin'
@openstack_auth_uri = URI.parse(options[:openstack_auth_url])
@openstack_management_url = @openstack_auth_uri.to_s
Method get_host_details
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_host_details(_host)
response = Excon::Response.new
response.status = 200
response.body = {"host" => [
{"resource" => {
Method list_plans
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def list_plans(_options = {})
response = Excon::Response.new
response.status = [200, 204][rand(2)]
response.body = [
{
Method request
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def request(params, parse_json = true)
retried = false
begin
authenticate! if @expires && (@expires - Time.now.utc).to_i < 60
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
module Fog
module OpenStack
class Volume
class V2
class Real
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 65.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76