File version_5_1.rb
has 1766 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'ruby-progressbar'
require 'set'
require 'netaddr'
require 'uri'
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method compose_vapp_from_vm
has a Cognitive Complexity of 167 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def compose_vapp_from_vm(vdc, vapp_name, vapp_description, vm_list = {}, network_config = [], _cfg)
builder = Nokogiri::XML::Builder.new do |xml|
xml.ComposeVAppParams('xmlns' => 'http://www.vmware.com/vcloud/v1.5',
'xmlns:ovf' => 'http://schemas.dmtf.org/ovf/envelope/1',
'deploy' => 'false',
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method set_vm_hardware
has a Cognitive Complexity of 101 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set_vm_hardware(vm_id, cfg)
params = {
'method' => :get,
'command' => "/vApp/vm-#{vm_id}/virtualHardwareSection"
}
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method recompose_vapp_from_vm
has a Cognitive Complexity of 100 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def recompose_vapp_from_vm(vapp_id, vm_list = {}, network_config = [], _cfg)
original_vapp = get_vapp(vapp_id)
builder = Nokogiri::XML::Builder.new do |xml|
xml.RecomposeVAppParams(
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class Version_5_1
has 58 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Version_5_1 < Base
attr_reader :auth_key, :id
##
# Init the driver with the Vagrantfile information
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method set_vm_hardware
has 161 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set_vm_hardware(vm_id, cfg)
params = {
'method' => :get,
'command' => "/vApp/vm-#{vm_id}/virtualHardwareSection"
}
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method upload_ovf
has 132 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def upload_ovf(vdc_id, vapp_name, vapp_description, ovf_file, catalog_id, upload_options = {})
# if send_manifest is not set, setting it true
if upload_options[:send_manifest].nil? ||
upload_options[:send_manifest]
upload_manifest = 'true'
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method compose_vapp_from_vm
has 131 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def compose_vapp_from_vm(vdc, vapp_name, vapp_description, vm_list = {}, network_config = [], _cfg)
builder = Nokogiri::XML::Builder.new do |xml|
xml.ComposeVAppParams('xmlns' => 'http://www.vmware.com/vcloud/v1.5',
'xmlns:ovf' => 'http://schemas.dmtf.org/ovf/envelope/1',
'deploy' => 'false',
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method add_edge_gateway_rules
has 108 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_edge_gateway_rules(edge_gateway_name, vdc_id, edge_gateway_ip, vapp_id, ports)
edge_vapp_ip = get_vapp_edge_public_ip(vapp_id)
edge_network_id = find_edge_gateway_network(
edge_gateway_name,
vdc_id,
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method recompose_vapp_from_vm
has 78 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def recompose_vapp_from_vm(vapp_id, vm_list = {}, network_config = [], _cfg)
original_vapp = get_vapp(vapp_id)
builder = Nokogiri::XML::Builder.new do |xml|
xml.RecomposeVAppParams(
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method get_vapp_edge_public_ip
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_vapp_edge_public_ip(vapp_id, network_name=nil)
return @cached_vapp_edge_public_ips["#{vapp_id}#{network_name}"] unless @cached_vapp_edge_public_ips["#{vapp_id}#{network_name}"].nil?
# Check the network configuration section
params = {
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_edge_gateway_rules
has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_edge_gateway_rules(edge_gateway_name, vdc_id)
edge_gateway_id = find_edge_gateway_id(edge_gateway_name, vdc_id)
params = {
'method' => :get,
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method remove_edge_gateway_rules
has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def remove_edge_gateway_rules(edge_gateway_name, vdc_id, edge_gateway_ip, vapp_id)
edge_vapp_ip = get_vapp_edge_public_ip(vapp_id)
edge_gateway_id = find_edge_gateway_id(edge_gateway_name, vdc_id)
params = {
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method get_vapp_port_forwarding_rules
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_vapp_port_forwarding_rules(vapp_id, network_name=nil)
params = {
'method' => :get,
'command' => "/vApp/vapp-#{vapp_id}/networkConfigSection"
}
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method get_vapp_port_forwarding_rules
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_vapp_port_forwarding_rules(vapp_id, network_name=nil)
params = {
'method' => :get,
'command' => "/vApp/vapp-#{vapp_id}/networkConfigSection"
}
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_organization
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_organization(org_id)
params = {
'method' => :get,
'command' => "/org/#{org_id}"
}
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method set_vapp_port_forwarding_rules
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set_vapp_port_forwarding_rules(vapp_id, network_name, config = {})
builder = Nokogiri::XML::Builder.new do |xml|
xml.NetworkConfigSection(
'xmlns' => 'http://www.vmware.com/vcloud/v1.5',
'xmlns:ovf' => 'http://schemas.dmtf.org/ovf/envelope/1') {
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method get_vm
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_vm(vm_id)
params = {
'method' => :get,
'command' => "/vApp/vm-#{vm_id}"
}
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method get_vapp_edge_public_ip
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_vapp_edge_public_ip(vapp_id, network_name=nil)
return @cached_vapp_edge_public_ips["#{vapp_id}#{network_name}"] unless @cached_vapp_edge_public_ips["#{vapp_id}#{network_name}"].nil?
# Check the network configuration section
params = {
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method get_vapp
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_vapp(vapp_id)
params = {
'method' => :get,
'command' => "/vApp/vapp-#{vapp_id}"
}
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method find_edge_gateway_network
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find_edge_gateway_network(edge_gateway_name, vdc_id, edge_gateway_ip)
params = {
'method' => :get,
'command' => '/query?type=edgeGateway&' \
'format=records&' \
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method set_metadata
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set_metadata(link, data)
params = {
'method' => :post,
'command' => "/#{link}/metadata"
}
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method add_vapp_port_forwarding_rules
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_vapp_port_forwarding_rules(vapp_id, network_name, edge_network_name, config = {})
params = {
'method' => :get,
'command' => "/vApp/vapp-#{vapp_id}/networkConfigSection"
}
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method set_ovf_properties
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set_ovf_properties(vm_id, properties)
params = {
'method' => :get,
'command' => "/vApp/vm-#{vm_id}/productSections"
}
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method create_vapp_from_template
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_vapp_from_template(vdc, vapp_name, vapp_description, vapp_template_id, poweron = false)
builder = Nokogiri::XML::Builder.new do |xml|
xml.InstantiateVAppTemplateParams(
'xmlns' => 'http://www.vmware.com/vcloud/v1.5',
'xmlns:xsi' => 'http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance',
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method get_catalog_id_by_name
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_catalog_id_by_name(organization, catalog_name)
result = nil
organization[:catalogs].each do |catalog|
if catalog[0].downcase == catalog_name.downcase
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method set_vm_network_config
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set_vm_network_config(vm_id, network_name, config = {})
builder = Nokogiri::XML::Builder.new do |xml|
xml.NetworkConnectionSection(
'xmlns' => 'http://www.vmware.com/vcloud/v1.5',
'xmlns:ovf' => 'http://schemas.dmtf.org/ovf/envelope/1') {
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method upload_ovf
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def upload_ovf(vdc_id, vapp_name, vapp_description, ovf_file, catalog_id, upload_options = {})
# if send_manifest is not set, setting it true
if upload_options[:send_manifest].nil? ||
upload_options[:send_manifest]
upload_manifest = 'true'
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_vdc
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_vdc(vdc_id)
params = {
'method' => :get,
'command' => "/vdc/#{vdc_id}"
}
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method set_vapp_network_config
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set_vapp_network_config(vapp_id, network_name, config = {})
builder = Nokogiri::XML::Builder.new do |xml|
xml.NetworkConfigSection(
'xmlns' => 'http://www.vmware.com/vcloud/v1.5',
'xmlns:ovf' => 'http://schemas.dmtf.org/ovf/envelope/1'
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method set_vm_network_connected
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set_vm_network_connected(vm_id)
params = {
'method' => :get,
'command' => "/vApp/vm-#{vm_id}/networkConnectionSection"
}
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method set_vm_network_config
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set_vm_network_config(vm_id, network_name, config = {})
builder = Nokogiri::XML::Builder.new do |xml|
xml.NetworkConnectionSection(
'xmlns' => 'http://www.vmware.com/vcloud/v1.5',
'xmlns:ovf' => 'http://schemas.dmtf.org/ovf/envelope/1') {
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_edge_gateway_rules
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_edge_gateway_rules(edge_gateway_name, vdc_id, edge_gateway_ip, vapp_id, ports)
edge_vapp_ip = get_vapp_edge_public_ip(vapp_id)
edge_network_id = find_edge_gateway_network(
edge_gateway_name,
vdc_id,
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method set_ovf_properties
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set_ovf_properties(vm_id, properties)
params = {
'method' => :get,
'command' => "/vApp/vm-#{vm_id}/productSections"
}
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method set_vm_guest_customization
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set_vm_guest_customization(vm_id, computer_name, config = {})
builder = Nokogiri::XML::Builder.new do |xml|
xml.GuestCustomizationSection(
'xmlns' => 'http://www.vmware.com/vcloud/v1.5',
'xmlns:ovf' => 'http://schemas.dmtf.org/ovf/envelope/1') {
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method upload_ovf
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def upload_ovf(vdc_id, vapp_name, vapp_description, ovf_file, catalog_id, upload_options = {})
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
changed = true if orig_ip.nil? || nic[:ip].upcase != orig_ip.upcase
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if hdd_parent_id == item.css('rasd|Parent').first.text
hdd_address_on_parent = [ hdd_address_on_parent, item.css('rasd|AddressOnParent').first.text.to_i ].max
end
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method compose_vapp_from_vm
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def compose_vapp_from_vm(vdc, vapp_name, vapp_description, vm_list = {}, network_config = [], _cfg)
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
item.css('rasd|Address').first.content = nic[:mac] if !nic[:mac].nil?
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
changed = true if nic[:mac].upcase != orig_mac.upcase
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
item.css('rasd|AddressOnParent').first.content = nic_address_on_parent if nic_address_on_parent != orig_parent
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if nic[:ip_mode].upcase == 'DHCP'
conn['vcloud:ipAddressingMode'] = 'DHCP'
elsif nic[:ip_mode].upcase == 'STATIC'
conn['vcloud:ipAddressingMode'] = 'MANUAL'
conn['vcloud:ipAddress'] = nic[:ip]
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if hdd_parent_id.nil?
hdd_parent_id = item.css('rasd|Parent').first.text
hdd_bus_type = item.css('rasd|HostResource').first[:busType]
hdd_bus_sub_type = item.css('rasd|HostResource').first[:busSubType]
end
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method create_vapp_from_template
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_vapp_from_template(vdc, vapp_name, vapp_description, vapp_template_id, poweron = false)
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method add_edge_gateway_rules
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_edge_gateway_rules(edge_gateway_name, vdc_id, edge_gateway_ip, vapp_id, ports)
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method find_edge_gateway_network
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find_edge_gateway_network(edge_gateway_name, vdc_id, edge_gateway_ip)
params = {
'method' => :get,
'command' => '/query?type=edgeGateway&' \
'format=records&' \
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method set_metadata
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set_metadata(link, data)
params = {
'method' => :post,
'command' => "/#{link}/metadata"
}
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method remove_edge_gateway_rules
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def remove_edge_gateway_rules(edge_gateway_name, vdc_id, edge_gateway_ip, vapp_id)
edge_vapp_ip = get_vapp_edge_public_ip(vapp_id)
edge_gateway_id = find_edge_gateway_id(edge_gateway_name, vdc_id)
params = {
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_edge_gateway_rules
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_edge_gateway_rules(edge_gateway_name, vdc_id)
edge_gateway_id = find_edge_gateway_id(edge_gateway_name, vdc_id)
params = {
'method' => :get,
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_catalog_id_by_name
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_catalog_id_by_name(organization, catalog_name)
result = nil
organization[:catalogs].each do |catalog|
if catalog[0].downcase == catalog_name.downcase
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_vapp
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_vapp(vapp_id)
params = {
'method' => :get,
'command' => "/vApp/vapp-#{vapp_id}"
}
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
vm_list.each do |vm_name, vm_id|
xml.SourcedItem {
xml.Source('href' => "#{@api_url}/vAppTemplate/vm-#{vm_id}", 'name' => vm_name)
xml.InstantiationParams {
if _cfg.enable_guest_customization.nil? || _cfg.enable_guest_customization
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 233.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
vm_list.each do |vm_name, vm_id|
xml.SourcedItem {
xml.Source('href' => "#{@api_url}/vAppTemplate/vm-#{vm_id}", 'name' => vm_name)
xml.InstantiationParams {
if _cfg.enable_guest_customization.nil? || _cfg.enable_guest_customization
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 233.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def get_catalog_item(catalog_item_id)
params = {
'method' => :get,
'command' => "/catalogItem/#{catalog_item_id}"
}
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def get_catalog(catalog_id)
params = {
'method' => :get,
'command' => "/catalog/#{catalog_id}"
}
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if nic[:ip_mode].upcase == 'DHCP'
conn['vcloud:ipAddressingMode'] = 'DHCP'
elsif nic[:ip_mode].upcase == 'STATIC'
conn['vcloud:ipAddressingMode'] = 'MANUAL'
conn['vcloud:ipAddress'] = nic[:ip]
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 53.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if nic[:ip_mode].upcase == 'DHCP'
conn['vcloud:ipAddressingMode'] = 'DHCP'
elsif nic[:ip_mode].upcase == 'STATIC'
conn['vcloud:ipAddressingMode'] = 'MANUAL'
conn['vcloud:ipAddress'] = nic[:ip]
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 53.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def poweroff_vm(vm_id)
builder = Nokogiri::XML::Builder.new do |xml|
xml.UndeployVAppParams(
'xmlns' => 'http://www.vmware.com/vcloud/v1.5'
) { xml.UndeployPowerAction 'powerOff' }
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def suspend_vm(vm_id)
builder = Nokogiri::XML::Builder.new do |xml|
xml.UndeployVAppParams(
'xmlns' => 'http://www.vmware.com/vcloud/v1.5'
) { xml.UndeployPowerAction 'suspend' }
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def shutdown_vm(vm_id)
builder = Nokogiri::XML::Builder.new do |xml|
xml.UndeployVAppParams(
'xmlns' => 'http://www.vmware.com/vcloud/v1.5'
) { xml.UndeployPowerAction 'shutdown' }
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def poweroff_vapp(vapp_id)
builder = Nokogiri::XML::Builder.new do |xml|
xml.UndeployVAppParams(
'xmlns' => 'http://www.vmware.com/vcloud/v1.5'
) { xml.UndeployPowerAction 'powerOff' }
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if nconfig.size > 1
nconfig.each {|c|
pn = c.css('/Configuration/ParentNetwork')
next if pn.size == 0
if pn.first['name'] == network_name
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 37.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if nconfig.size > 1
nconfig.each {|c|
pn = c.css('/Configuration/ParentNetwork')
next if pn.size == 0
if pn.first['name'] == network_name
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 37.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if cfg.memory
if item.at_css('rasd|VirtualQuantity').content != cfg.memory.to_s
item.at_css('rasd|VirtualQuantity').content = cfg.memory
item.at_css('rasd|ElementName').content = "#{cfg.memory} MB of memory"
changed = true
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 30.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if cfg.cpus
if item.at_css('rasd|VirtualQuantity').content != cfg.cpus.to_s
item.at_css('rasd|VirtualQuantity').content = cfg.cpus
item.at_css('rasd|ElementName').content = "#{cfg.cpus} virtual CPU(s)"
changed = true
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 30.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 8 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def poweron_vapp(vapp_id)
params = {
'method' => :post,
'command' => "/vApp/vapp-#{vapp_id}/power/action/powerOn"
}
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 28.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 8 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def reboot_vm(vm_id)
params = {
'method' => :post,
'command' => "/vApp/vm-#{vm_id}/power/action/reboot"
}
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 28.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 8 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def reboot_vapp(vapp_id)
params = {
'method' => :post,
'command' => "/vApp/vapp-#{vapp_id}/power/action/reboot"
}
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 28.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 8 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def suspend_vapp(vapp_id)
params = {
'method' => :post,
'command' => "/vApp/vapp-#{vapp_id}/power/action/suspend"
}
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 28.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 8 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def reset_vm(vm_id)
params = {
'method' => :post,
'command' => "/vApp/vm-#{vm_id}/power/action/reset"
}
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 28.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 8 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def poweron_vm(vm_id)
params = {
'method' => :post,
'command' => "/vApp/vm-#{vm_id}/power/action/powerOn"
}
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 28.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 8 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def reset_vapp(vapp_id)
params = {
'method' => :post,
'command' => "/vApp/vapp-#{vapp_id}/power/action/reset"
}
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 28.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 8 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def redeploy_edge_gateway(edge_gateway_id)
params = {
'method' => :post,
'command' => "/admin/edgeGateway/#{edge_gateway_id}/action/redeploy"
}
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 28.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def delete_vm(vm_id)
params = {
'method' => :delete,
'command' => "/vApp/vm-#{vm_id}"
}
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 27.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def delete_vapp(vapp_id)
params = {
'method' => :delete,
'command' => "/vApp/vapp-#{vapp_id}"
}
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 27.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76