lib/gherkin_lint/linter/unused_variable.rb
Method lint has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
def lint
scenarios do |file, feature, scenario|
next unless scenario.key? :examples
scenario[:examples].each do |example|
next unless example.key? :tableHeader- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method used? has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
def used?(variable, scenario)
variable = "<#{variable}>"
return false unless scenario.key? :steps
scenario[:steps].each do |step|
return true if step[:text].include? variable- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"