Showing 152 of 152 total issues
Method _nt_day_month_name_year
has 73 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _nt_day_month_name_year
start_index = index
if node_cache[:day_month_name_year].has_key?(index)
cached = node_cache[:day_month_name_year][index]
if cached
Method _nt_before_from_moment
has 72 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _nt_before_from_moment
start_index = index
if node_cache[:before_from_moment].has_key?(index)
cached = node_cache[:before_from_moment][index]
if cached
File natural_time_language_interpreters.rb
has 283 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module Timing
module NaturalTimeLanguage
class << self
Method _nt_expression
has 69 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _nt_expression
start_index = index
if node_cache[:expression].has_key?(index)
cached = node_cache[:expression][index]
if cached
Method _nt_named_moment
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _nt_named_moment
start_index = index
if node_cache[:named_moment].has_key?(index)
cached = node_cache[:named_moment][index]
if cached
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class TimeInZone
has 24 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class TimeInZone
extend Forwardable
REGEXP = /[+-]\d\d:?\d\d$/
Method _nt_last_next_day_name
has 66 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _nt_last_next_day_name
start_index = index
if node_cache[:last_next_day_name].has_key?(index)
cached = node_cache[:last_next_day_name][index]
if cached
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if r2
r4 = _nt_month_name
s0 << r4
if r4
s5, i5 = [], index
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 91.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if r1
r3 = _nt_moment
s0 << r3
if r3
s4, i4 = [], index
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 91.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method _nt_time_ago
has 61 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _nt_time_ago
start_index = index
if node_cache[:time_ago].has_key?(index)
cached = node_cache[:time_ago][index]
if cached
Method _nt_moment_at_time
has 61 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _nt_moment_at_time
start_index = index
if node_cache[:moment_at_time].has_key?(index)
cached = node_cache[:moment_at_time][index]
if cached
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def _nt_date_moment
start_index = index
if node_cache[:date_moment].has_key?(index)
cached = node_cache[:date_moment][index]
if cached
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 87.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def _nt_moment
start_index = index
if node_cache[:moment].has_key?(index)
cached = node_cache[:moment][index]
if cached
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 87.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method _nt_week_interval
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _nt_week_interval
start_index = index
if node_cache[:week_interval].has_key?(index)
cached = node_cache[:week_interval][index]
if cached
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method _nt_day_interval
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _nt_day_interval
start_index = index
if node_cache[:day_interval].has_key?(index)
cached = node_cache[:day_interval][index]
if cached
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method _nt_minute_interval
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _nt_minute_interval
start_index = index
if node_cache[:minute_interval].has_key?(index)
cached = node_cache[:minute_interval][index]
if cached
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method _nt_hour_interval
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _nt_hour_interval
start_index = index
if node_cache[:hour_interval].has_key?(index)
cached = node_cache[:hour_interval][index]
if cached
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method _nt_month_interval
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _nt_month_interval
start_index = index
if node_cache[:month_interval].has_key?(index)
cached = node_cache[:month_interval][index]
if cached
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method _nt_year_interval
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _nt_year_interval
start_index = index
if node_cache[:year_interval].has_key?(index)
cached = node_cache[:year_interval][index]
if cached
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method _nt_second_interval
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _nt_second_interval
start_index = index
if node_cache[:second_interval].has_key?(index)
cached = node_cache[:second_interval][index]
if cached
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"