Function choose_target_drives
has a Cognitive Complexity of 164 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static function choose_target_drives($filesize_kb, $include_full_drives, $share, $path, $log_prefix = '', &$is_sticky = NULL) {
global $last_OOS_notification;
foreach (SharesConfig::get($share, CONFIG_DRIVE_SELECTION_ALGORITHM) as $ds) {
$algo = $ds->selection_algorithm;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function check_drives
has a Cognitive Complexity of 61 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static function check_drives() {
Log::setAction(ACTION_CHECK_POOL);
// If last 'df' ran less than 10s ago, all the drives are already awake; no harm checking them at this time.
global $last_df_time;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File StoragePool.php
has 560 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
<?php
/*
Copyright 2009-2020 Guillaume Boudreau
This file is part of Greyhole.
Method choose_target_drives
has 210 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static function choose_target_drives($filesize_kb, $include_full_drives, $share, $path, $log_prefix = '', &$is_sticky = NULL) {
global $last_OOS_notification;
foreach (SharesConfig::get($share, CONFIG_DRIVE_SELECTION_ALGORITHM) as $ds) {
$algo = $ds->selection_algorithm;
Function get_free_space
has a Cognitive Complexity of 33 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static function get_free_space($for_sp_drive) {
if (time() > StoragePool::$last_df_time + Config::get(CONFIG_DF_CACHE_TIME)) {
$dfs = [];
exec(ConfigHelper::$df_command, $responses);
$responses_arr = array();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method check_drives
has 116 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static function check_drives() {
Log::setAction(ACTION_CHECK_POOL);
// If last 'df' ran less than 10s ago, all the drives are already awake; no harm checking them at this time.
global $last_df_time;
Function get_file_copies_inodes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 29 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static function get_file_copies_inodes($share, $file_path, $filename, &$file_metafiles, $one_is_enough = FALSE) {
$file_copies_inodes = [];
foreach (Config::storagePoolDrives() as $sp_drive) {
$clean_full_path = clean_dir("$sp_drive/$share/$file_path/$filename");
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function is_pool_drive
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static function is_pool_drive($sp_drive) {
global $going_drive;
if (isset($going_drive) && $sp_drive == $going_drive) {
return FALSE;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_free_space
has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static function get_free_space($for_sp_drive) {
if (time() > StoragePool::$last_df_time + Config::get(CONFIG_DF_CACHE_TIME)) {
$dfs = [];
exec(ConfigHelper::$df_command, $responses);
$responses_arr = array();
Method get_file_copies_inodes
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static function get_file_copies_inodes($share, $file_path, $filename, &$file_metafiles, $one_is_enough = FALSE) {
$file_copies_inodes = [];
foreach (Config::storagePoolDrives() as $sp_drive) {
$clean_full_path = clean_dir("$sp_drive/$share/$file_path/$filename");
Method is_pool_drive
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static function is_pool_drive($sp_drive) {
global $going_drive;
if (isset($going_drive) && $sp_drive == $going_drive) {
return FALSE;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ($needle == '') {
$needle = '/';
}
Method choose_target_drives
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static function choose_target_drives($filesize_kb, $include_full_drives, $share, $path, $log_prefix = '', &$is_sticky = NULL) {
Method get_file_copies_inodes
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static function get_file_copies_inodes($share, $file_path, $filename, &$file_metafiles, $one_is_enough = FALSE) {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (!empty($last_resort_sorted_target_drives)) {
$log = $log_prefix . "Drives with enough free space, but no available space: ";
foreach ($last_resort_sorted_target_drives as $sp_drive => $space) {
/** @noinspection PhpUndefinedVariableInspection */
$log .= "$sp_drive (" . bytes_to_human($space*1024, FALSE) . " " . ($algo == 'most_available_space' ? 'avail' : 'used') . ") - ";
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 115.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (!empty($sorted_target_drives)) {
$log = $log_prefix . "Drives with available space: ";
foreach ($sorted_target_drives as $sp_drive => $space) {
/** @noinspection PhpUndefinedVariableInspection */
$log .= "$sp_drive (" . bytes_to_human($space*1024, FALSE) . " " . ($algo == 'most_available_space' ? 'avail' : 'used') . ") - ";
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 115.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76