Showing 69 of 69 total issues
Function getUse
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async getUse(useTable: string, id: string, alertQuery: string, period: string = defaultDate(), apiKey: string): Promise<Record<string, any>> {
logger.debug('Obtaining use with id %s', id);
const periods: string[] = period.split(',');
const params: Record<string, any> = {
useTable,
Function getAdm0
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async getAdm0(iso: string, alertQuery: string, period: string = defaultDate()): Promise<Record<string, any>> {
logger.debug('Obtaining national of iso %s', iso);
const gid: Record<string, any> = routeToGid(iso);
const simplify: number = getSimplify(iso);
const periods: string[] = period.split(',');
Function getWdpa
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async getWdpa(wdpaid: string, alertQuery: string, period: string = defaultDate(), apiKey: string): Promise<Record<string, any>> {
logger.debug('Obtaining wpda of id %s', wdpaid);
const periods: string[] = period.split(',');
const params: Record<string, any> = {
wdpaid,
Function getAdm2
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async getAdm2(iso: string, id1: string, id2: string, alertQuery: string, period: string = defaultDate()): Promise<Record<string, any>> {
logger.debug('Obtaining regional data', iso, id1, id2);
const gid: Record<string, any> = routeToGid(iso, id1, id2);
const simplify: number = getSimplify(iso) / 100;
const periods: string[] = period.split(',');
Function getAdm1
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async getAdm1(iso: string, id1: string, alertQuery: string, period: string = defaultDate()): Promise<Record<string, any>> {
logger.debug('Obtaining subnational of iso %s and id1', iso, id1);
const gid: Record<string, any> = routeToGid(iso, id1);
const simplify: number = getSimplify(iso) / 100;
const periods: string[] = period.split(',');
Function getAdm0
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async getAdm0(iso: string, alertQuery: string, period: string = defaultDate()): Promise<Record<string, any>> {
logger.debug('Obtaining national of iso %s', iso);
const gid: Record<string, any> = routeToGid(iso);
const simplify: number = getSimplify(iso);
const periods: string[] = period.split(',');
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getSubnational
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async getSubnational(iso: string, id1: string, alertQuery: string, period: string = defaultDate(), apiKey: string): Promise<Record<string, any>> {
logger.debug('Obtaining subnational of iso %s and id1', iso, id1);
const periods: string[] = period.split(',');
const params: Record<string, any> = {
iso,
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const isCached = async (ctx: Context, next: Next): Promise<void> => {
if (await ctx.cashed()) {
return;
}
await next();
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const isCached = async (ctx: Context, next: Next): Promise<void> => {
if (await ctx.cashed()) {
return;
}
await next();
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function getNational
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async getNational(iso: string, alertQuery: string, period: string = defaultDate(), apiKey: string): Promise<Record<string, any>> {
logger.debug('Obtaining national of iso %s', iso);
const periods: string[] = period.split(',');
const params: Record<string, any> = {
iso,
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
constructor() {
this.client = new CartoDB.SQL({
user: config.get('cartoDB.user')
});
this.apiUrl = config.get('cartoDB.apiUrl');
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 60.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
constructor() {
this.client = new CartoDB.SQL({
user: config.get('cartoDB.user')
});
this.apiUrl = config.get('cartoDB.apiUrl');
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 60.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function use
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static async use(ctx: Context): Promise<void> {
logger.info('Obtaining use data with name %s and id %s', ctx.params.name, ctx.params.id);
let useTable: string;
switch (ctx.params.name) {
Function getUse
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async getUse(useName: string, useTable: string, id: string, alertQuery: string, period: string = defaultDate(), apiKey: string): Promise<Record<string, any>> {
logger.debug('Obtaining use with id %s', id);
const periods: string[] = period.split(',');
const params: Record<string, any> = {
useTable,
Function getWdpa
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async getWdpa(wdpaid: string, alertQuery: string, period: string = defaultDate(), apiKey: string): Promise<Record<string, any>> {
logger.debug('Obtaining wpda of id %s', wdpaid);
const periods: string[] = period.split(',');
const params: Record<string, any> = {
wdpaid,
Function getWdpa
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async getWdpa(wdpaid: string, alertQuery: string, period: string = defaultDate(), apiKey: string): Promise<Record<string, any>> {
logger.debug('Obtaining wpda of id %s', wdpaid);
const periods: string[] = period.split(',');
const params: Record<string, any> = {
wdpaid,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getUse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async getUse(useTable: string, id: string, alertQuery: string, period: string = defaultDate(), apiKey: string): Promise<Record<string, any>> {
logger.debug('Obtaining use with id %s', id);
const periods: string[] = period.split(',');
const params: Record<string, any> = {
useTable,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getAdm2
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async getAdm2(iso: string, id1: string, id2: string, alertQuery: string, period: string = defaultDate()): Promise<Record<string, any>> {
logger.debug('Obtaining regional data', iso, id1, id2);
const gid: Record<string, any> = routeToGid(iso, id1, id2);
const simplify: number = getSimplify(iso) / 100;
const periods: string[] = period.split(',');
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getAdm1
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async getAdm1(iso: string, id1: string, alertQuery: string, period: string = defaultDate()): Promise<Record<string, any>> {
logger.debug('Obtaining subnational of iso %s and id1', iso, id1);
const gid: Record<string, any> = routeToGid(iso, id1);
const simplify: number = getSimplify(iso) / 100;
const periods: string[] = period.split(',');
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const area: Record<string, any> = await executeThunk(this.client, GIDAREA, {
table: 'gadm36_adm2',
level: '2',
gid: params.id2
});
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 50.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76