Showing 58 of 58 total issues
Function parse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 93 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse(input_filename, output_filename, drop_index_filename):
"Feed it a file, and it'll output a fixed one"
# State storage
if input_filename == "-":
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class Converter
has 65 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Converter
def on_0(s) reset() end
def on_1(s) enable(STYLE_SWITCHES[:bold]) end
def on_3(s) enable(STYLE_SWITCHES[:italic]) end
def on_4(s) enable(STYLE_SWITCHES[:underline]) end
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
elif line.startswith("UNIQUE KEY \""):
index_name = line.split('"')[1].split('"')[0]
index_columns = line.split("(")[1].split(")")[0]
index_lines.append("CREATE UNIQUE INDEX \"%s\" ON %s (%s)" % (index_name, current_table, index_columns))
drop_index_lines.append("DROP INDEX IF EXISTS \"%s\"" % index_name)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 93.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
elif line.startswith("KEY \""):
index_name = line.split('"')[1].split('"')[0]
index_columns = line.split("(")[1].split(")")[0]
index_lines.append("CREATE INDEX \"%s\" ON %s (%s)" % (index_name, current_table, index_columns))
drop_index_lines.append("DROP INDEX IF EXISTS \"%s\"" % index_name)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 93.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Class Commit
has 35 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Commit < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :project
has_many :builds, dependent: :destroy
has_many :trigger_requests, dependent: :destroy
Class Build
has 28 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Build < ActiveRecord::Base
LAZY_ATTRIBUTES = ['trace']
belongs_to :commit
belongs_to :project
Class Project
has 24 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Project < ActiveRecord::Base
include ProjectStatus
has_many :commits, ->() { order('CASE WHEN commits.committed_at IS NULL THEN 0 ELSE 1 END', :committed_at, :id) }, dependent: :destroy
has_many :builds, through: :commits, dependent: :destroy
Method nav_link
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def nav_link(options = {}, &block)
if path = options.delete(:path)
if path.respond_to?(:each)
c = path.map { |p| p.split('#').first }
a = path.map { |p| p.split('#').last }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validate_job!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate_job!(name, job)
job.keys.each do |key|
unless ALLOWED_JOB_KEYS.include? key
raise ValidationError, "#{name}: unknown parameter #{key}"
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method remove_old
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def remove_old
# delete backups
$progress.print "Deleting old backups ... "
keep_time = GitlabCi.config.backup.keep_time.to_i
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method process?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process?(only_params, except_params, ref, tag)
return true if only_params.nil? && except_params.nil?
if only_params
return true if tag && only_params.include?("tags")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
elif line.startswith("UNIQUE KEY"):
index_columns = line.split("(")[1].split(")")[0]
index_lines.append("CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON %s (%s)" % (current_table, index_columns))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
elif line.startswith("KEY"):
index_columns = line.split("(")[1].split(")")[0]
index_lines.append("CREATE INDEX ON %s (%s)" % (current_table, index_columns))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method handle_sequence
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def handle_sequence(s)
indicator = s[1]
commands = s[2].split ';'
terminator = s[3]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method <=>
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def <=>(other)
return unless other.is_a? VersionInfo
return unless valid? && other.valid?
if other.major < @major
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method execute
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def execute(project, params)
before_sha = params[:before]
sha = params[:checkout_sha] || params[:after]
origin_ref = params[:ref]
Function parse
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse(input_filename, output_filename, drop_index_filename):
"Feed it a file, and it'll output a fixed one"
# State storage
if input_filename == "-":
Method unpack
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def unpack
Dir.chdir(GitlabCi.config.backup.path)
# check for existing backups in the backup dir
file_list = Dir.glob("*_gitlab_ci_backup.tar").each.map { |f| f.split(/_/).first.to_i }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validate!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate!
unless validate_array_of_strings(@before_script)
raise ValidationError, "before_script should be an array of strings"
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validate_job!
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate_job!(name, job)
job.keys.each do |key|
unless ALLOWED_JOB_KEYS.include? key
raise ValidationError, "#{name}: unknown parameter #{key}"
end