Showing 109 of 109 total issues
File lfstransfer_test.go
has 1334 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
package lfstransfer
import (
"context"
"crypto/hmac"
Function setup
has 350 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func setup(t *testing.T, keyID string, repo string, op string) (string, *Command, *pktline.Pktline, *io.PipeReader) {
var url string
gitalyAddress, _ := testserver.StartGitalyServer(t, "unix")
requests := []testserver.TestRequestHandler{
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
describe 'Custom bin/gitlab-shell git-upload-pack' do
include_context 'gitlab shell'
let(:env) { {'SSH_CONNECTION' => 'fake', 'SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND' => 'git-upload-pack group/repo' } }
let(:divider) { "remote: ========================================================================\n" }
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 313.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
describe 'Custom bin/gitlab-shell git-receive-pack' do
include_context 'gitlab shell'
let(:env) { {'SSH_CONNECTION' => 'fake', 'SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND' => 'git-receive-pack group/repo' } }
let(:divider) { "remote: ========================================================================\n" }
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 313.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function TestLfsTransferGetObject
has 153 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func TestLfsTransferGetObject(t *testing.T) {
url, cmd, pl, _ := setup(t, "rw", "group/repo", "download")
wg := setupWaitGroupForExecute(t, cmd)
negotiateVersion(t, pl)
Function TestListenAndServe_proxyProtocolEnabled
has 151 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func TestListenAndServe_proxyProtocolEnabled(t *testing.T) {
testRoot := testhelper.PrepareTestRootDir(t)
target, err := net.ResolveTCPAddr("tcp", serverURL)
require.NoError(t, err)
Function TestExecute
has 149 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func TestExecute(t *testing.T) {
setup(t)
url := testserver.StartSocketHTTPServer(t, requests)
Function TestLfsTransferPutObject
has 149 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func TestLfsTransferPutObject(t *testing.T) {
url, cmd, pl, _ := setup(t, "rw", "group/repo", "upload")
wg := setupWaitGroupForExecute(t, cmd)
negotiateVersion(t, pl)
Function TestParseSuccess
has 132 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func TestParseSuccess(t *testing.T) {
testCases := []struct {
desc string
executable *executable.Executable
env sshenv.Env
Function TestLfsAuthenticateRequests
has 87 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func TestLfsAuthenticateRequests(t *testing.T) {
userID := "123"
operation := "upload"
requests := []testserver.TestRequestHandler{
Function setup
has a Cognitive Complexity of 33 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func setup(t *testing.T, keyID string, repo string, op string) (string, *Command, *pktline.Pktline, *io.PipeReader) {
var url string
gitalyAddress, _ := testserver.StartGitalyServer(t, "unix")
requests := []testserver.TestRequestHandler{
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function TestLfsTransferListLockUpload
has 82 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func TestLfsTransferListLockUpload(t *testing.T) {
_, cmd, pl, _ := setup(t, "rw", "group/repo", "upload")
wg := setupWaitGroupForExecute(t, cmd)
negotiateVersion(t, pl)
Function TestUserCertificateHandling
has 82 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func TestUserCertificateHandling(t *testing.T) {
testRoot := testhelper.PrepareTestRootDir(t)
validUserCert := userCert(t, ssh.UserCert, time.Now().Add(time.Hour))
Method mock_server
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def mock_server(server)
server.mount_proc('/api/v4/internal/lfs_authenticate') do |req, res|
res.content_type = 'application/json'
key_id = req.query['key_id'] || req.query['user_id']
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function TestHandleShell
has 76 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func TestHandleShell(t *testing.T) {
testCases := []struct {
desc string
cmd string
errMsg string
Function TestNewWithUsername
has 75 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func TestNewWithUsername(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
desc string
command string
namespace string
Function TestLfsTransferListLockDownload
has 73 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func TestLfsTransferListLockDownload(t *testing.T) {
_, cmd, pl, _ := setup(t, "rw", "group/repo", "download")
wg := setupWaitGroupForExecute(t, cmd)
negotiateVersion(t, pl)
Function TestNew
has 72 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func TestNew(t *testing.T) {
testCases := []struct {
desc string
executable *executable.Executable
env sshenv.Env
Function TestExecute
has 71 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func TestExecute(t *testing.T) {
setup(t)
url := testserver.StartSocketHTTPServer(t, requests)
Function TestReceivePack
has 70 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func TestReceivePack(t *testing.T) {
for _, network := range []string{"unix", "tcp", "dns"} {
t.Run(fmt.Sprintf("via %s network", network), func(t *testing.T) {
gitalyAddress, testServer := testserver.StartGitalyServer(t, network)
t.Log(fmt.Sprintf("Server address: %s", gitalyAddress))