Showing 29 of 37 total issues
Method repository.saveHasMany
has a Cognitive Complexity of 47 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (r repository) saveHasMany(cw contextWrapper, doc *Document, mutation *Mutation, insertion bool) error {
for _, field := range doc.HasMany() {
var (
assoc = doc.Association(field)
assocMuts, changed = mutation.Assoc[field]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function convertAssign
has 140 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func convertAssign(dest, src any) error {
// Common cases, without reflect.
switch s := src.(type) {
case string:
switch d := dest.(type) {
FilterQuery
has 34 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type FilterQuery struct {
Type FilterOp
Field string
Value any
Inner []FilterQuery
Query
has 33 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type Query struct {
empty bool // TODO: use bitmask to mark what is updated and use it when merging two queries
Table string
SelectQuery SelectQuery
JoinQuery []JoinQuery
Function convertAssign
has a Cognitive Complexity of 43 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func convertAssign(dest, src any) error {
// Common cases, without reflect.
switch s := src.(type) {
case string:
switch d := dest.(type) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method repository.mapPreloadTargets
has a Cognitive Complexity of 40 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (r repository) mapPreloadTargets(sl slice, path []string) (map[any][]slice, string, string, reflect.Type, DocumentMeta, bool) {
type frame struct {
index int
doc *Document
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Document
has 28 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type Document struct {
v any
rv reflect.Value
rt reflect.Type
meta DocumentMeta
Method Query.String
has 89 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (q Query) String() string {
if q.SQLQuery.Statement != "" {
return q.SQLQuery.String()
}
Function convertAssign
has 28 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func convertAssign(dest, src any) error {
// Common cases, without reflect.
switch s := src.(type) {
case string:
switch d := dest.(type) {
Table
has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type Table struct {
Op SchemaOp
Name string
Rename string
Definitions []TableDefinition
Method repository.saveHasMany
has 79 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (r repository) saveHasMany(cw contextWrapper, doc *Document, mutation *Mutation, insertion bool) error {
for _, field := range doc.HasMany() {
var (
assoc = doc.Association(field)
assocMuts, changed = mutation.Assoc[field]
Method repository.mapPreloadTargets
has 77 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (r repository) mapPreloadTargets(sl slice, path []string) (map[any][]slice, string, string, reflect.Type, DocumentMeta, bool) {
type frame struct {
index int
doc *Document
}
Function getDocumentMeta
has 74 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func getDocumentMeta(rt reflect.Type, skipAssoc bool) DocumentMeta {
if meta, cached := documentMetaCache.Load(rt); cached {
return DocumentMeta{
cachedDocumentMeta: meta.(cachedDocumentMeta),
rt: rt,
Function getAssociationMeta
has 73 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func getAssociationMeta(rt reflect.Type, index []int) AssociationMeta {
var (
key = associationKey{
rt: rt,
index: encodeIndices(index),
Function getDocumentMeta
has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func getDocumentMeta(rt reflect.Type, skipAssoc bool) DocumentMeta {
if meta, cached := documentMetaCache.Load(rt); cached {
return DocumentMeta{
cachedDocumentMeta: meta.(cachedDocumentMeta),
rt: rt,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Map.Apply
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (m Map) Apply(doc *Document, mutation *Mutation) {
var (
pField = doc.PrimaryField()
pValue = doc.PrimaryValue()
)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Document.Scanners
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (d Document) Scanners(fields []string) []any {
var (
result = make([]any, len(fields))
assocRefs map[string]struct {
fields []string
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getAssociationMeta
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func getAssociationMeta(rt reflect.Type, index []int) AssociationMeta {
var (
key = associationKey{
rt: rt,
index: encodeIndices(index),
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Changeset.applyAssocMany
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (c Changeset) applyAssocMany(field string, mut *Mutation) {
if chs, ok := c.assocMany[field]; ok {
var (
assoc = c.doc.Association(field)
col, _ = assoc.Collection()
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function isDeepZero
has 6 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func isDeepZero(rv reflect.Value, depth int) bool {
if depth < 0 {
return true
}