Showing 16 of 16 total issues
Method request
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def request(method, operation, params={}, body=nil)
begin
uri = generate_uri(operation)
#puts "request: #{@server} #{method} #{uri} #{params.inspect} #{body}"
request = ElasticSearch::Thrift::RestRequest.new
Method alias_index
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def alias_index(operations, options={})
if operations[:actions]
alias_ops = operations
else
alias_ops = { :actions => [] }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method search
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def search(query, options={})
index, type, options = extract_scope(options)
options[:size] ||= (options[:per_page] || options[:limit]) if options[:per_page] || options[:limit]
options[:from] ||= options[:size] * (options[:page].to_i-1) if options[:page] && options[:page].to_i > 1
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method request
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def request(method, operation, params={}, body=nil)
begin
uri = generate_uri(operation)
#puts "request: #{@server} #{method} #{uri} #{params.inspect} #{body}"
request = ElasticSearch::Thrift::RestRequest.new
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method extract_indices_and_options
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def extract_indices_and_options(args)
options = args.last.is_a?(Hash) ? args.pop : {}
indices = args.empty? ? [(default_index || :all)] : args.flatten
indices.collect! { |i| PSEUDO_INDICES.include?(i) ? "_#{i}" : i }
[indices, options]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method index
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def index(index, type, id, document, options={})
Method validate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate
raise ::Thrift::ProtocolException.new(::Thrift::ProtocolException::UNKNOWN, 'Required field method is unset!') unless @method
raise ::Thrift::ProtocolException.new(::Thrift::ProtocolException::UNKNOWN, 'Required field uri is unset!') unless @uri
unless @method.nil? || ElasticSearch::Thrift::Method::VALID_VALUES.include?(@method)
raise ::Thrift::ProtocolException.new(::Thrift::ProtocolException::UNKNOWN, 'Invalid value of field method!')
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def restart_nodes(*args)
options = args.last.is_a?(Hash) ? args.pop : {}
return false if args.empty?
nodes = args.flatten
nodes.collect! { |n| PSEUDO_NODES.include?(n) ? "_#{n}" : n }
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 35.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def shutdown_nodes(*args)
options = args.last.is_a?(Hash) ? args.pop : {}
return false if args.empty?
nodes = args.flatten
nodes.collect! { |n| PSEUDO_NODES.include?(n) ? "_#{n}" : n }
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 35.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method index
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def index(index, type, id, document, options={})
body = encoder.is_encoded?(document) ? document : encoder.encode(document)
if id.nil?
response = request(:post, {:index => index, :type => type}, options, body)
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if query.is_a?(Hash)
# Some http libraries cannot submit get requests with content, so if query is a hash, post it instead (assume a query hash is using the query dsl)
response = request(:post, {:index => index, :type => type, :op => "_count"}, options, encoder.encode(query))
else
response = request(:get, {:index => index, :type => type, :op => "_count"}, options.merge(:q => query))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 33.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if query.is_a?(Hash)
# Some http libraries cannot submit get requests with content, so if query is a hash, post it instead (assume a query hash is using the query dsl)
response = request(:get, {:index => index, :type => type, :op => "_search"}, options, encoder.encode(query))
else
response = request(:get, {:index => index, :type => type, :op => "_search"}, options.merge(:q => query))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 33.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method shutdown_nodes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def shutdown_nodes(*args)
options = args.last.is_a?(Hash) ? args.pop : {}
return false if args.empty?
nodes = args.flatten
nodes.collect! { |n| PSEUDO_NODES.include?(n) ? "_#{n}" : n }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method generate_uri
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def generate_uri(options)
path = ""
path << "/#{Array(options[:index]).collect { |i| escape(i.downcase) }.join(",")}" if options[:index] && !options[:index].empty?
path << "/*" if options[:index] && options[:index].empty?
path << "/#{Array(options[:type]).collect { |t| escape(t) }.join(",")}" if options[:type] && !options[:type].empty?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method restart_nodes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def restart_nodes(*args)
options = args.last.is_a?(Hash) ? args.pop : {}
return false if args.empty?
nodes = args.flatten
nodes.collect! { |n| PSEUDO_NODES.include?(n) ? "_#{n}" : n }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method next_server
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def next_server
if @retry_period
rebuild_live_server_list! if Time.now > @last_rebuild + @retry_period
raise NoServersAvailable, "No live servers in #{@servers.inspect} since #{@last_rebuild.inspect}." if @live_server_list.empty?
elsif @live_server_list.empty?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"