gwpy/timeseries/core.py

Summary

Maintainability
F
3 days
Test Coverage

File core.py has 1294 lines of code (exceeds 1000 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
# Copyright (C) Louisiana State University (2014-2017)
#               Cardiff University (2017-2021)
#
# This file is part of GWpy.
Severity: Major
Found in gwpy/timeseries/core.py - About 1 day to fix

Function find has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def find(cls, channels, start, end, frametype=None,
             frametype_match=None, pad=None, scaled=None, nproc=1,
             verbose=False, allow_tape=True, observatory=None, **readargs):
        """Find and read data from frames for a number of channels.

Severity: Minor
Found in gwpy/timeseries/core.py - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function fetch has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def fetch(cls, channels, start, end, host=None, port=None,
              verify=False, verbose=False, connection=None,
              pad=None, scaled=None, allow_tape=None, type=None,
              dtype=None):
        """Fetch data from NDS for a number of channels.
Severity: Minor
Found in gwpy/timeseries/core.py - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method fetch. (16)
Open

    @classmethod
    def fetch(cls, channels, start, end, host=None, port=None,
              verify=False, verbose=False, connection=None,
              pad=None, scaled=None, allow_tape=None, type=None,
              dtype=None):
Severity: Minor
Found in gwpy/timeseries/core.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method find. (16)
Open

    @classmethod
    def find(cls, channels, start, end, frametype=None,
             frametype_match=None, pad=None, scaled=None, nproc=1,
             verbose=False, allow_tape=True, observatory=None, **readargs):
        """Find and read data from frames for a number of channels.
Severity: Minor
Found in gwpy/timeseries/core.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

TimeSeriesBase has 21 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

class TimeSeriesBase(Series):
    """An `Array` with time-domain metadata.

    Parameters
    ----------
Severity: Minor
Found in gwpy/timeseries/core.py - About 2 hrs to fix

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method get. (13)
Open

    @classmethod
    def get(cls, channels, start, end, pad=None, scaled=None,
            dtype=None, verbose=False, allow_tape=None, **kwargs):
        """Retrieve data for multiple channels from frames or NDS

Severity: Minor
Found in gwpy/timeseries/core.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __new__. (12)
Open

    def __new__(cls, data, unit=None, t0=None, dt=None, sample_rate=None,
                times=None, channel=None, name=None, **kwargs):
        """Generate a new `TimeSeriesBase`.
        """
        # parse t0 or epoch
Severity: Minor
Found in gwpy/timeseries/core.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Function fetch has 13 arguments (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def fetch(cls, channel, start, end, host=None, port=None, verbose=False,
Severity: Major
Found in gwpy/timeseries/core.py - About 1 hr to fix

Function fetch has 13 arguments (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def fetch(cls, channels, start, end, host=None, port=None,
Severity: Major
Found in gwpy/timeseries/core.py - About 1 hr to fix

Function find has 13 arguments (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def find(cls, channels, start, end, frametype=None,
Severity: Major
Found in gwpy/timeseries/core.py - About 1 hr to fix

Function __array_ufunc__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def __array_ufunc__(self, ufunc, method, *inputs, **kwargs):
        out = super().__array_ufunc__(ufunc, method, *inputs, **kwargs)
        if out.dtype is numpy.dtype(bool) and len(inputs) == 2:
            from .statevector import StateTimeSeries
            orig, value = inputs
Severity: Minor
Found in gwpy/timeseries/core.py - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function get has 10 arguments (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def get(cls, channels, start, end, pad=None, scaled=None,
Severity: Major
Found in gwpy/timeseries/core.py - About 45 mins to fix

Function __new__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def __new__(cls, data, unit=None, t0=None, dt=None, sample_rate=None,
                times=None, channel=None, name=None, **kwargs):
        """Generate a new `TimeSeriesBase`.
        """
        # parse t0 or epoch
Severity: Minor
Found in gwpy/timeseries/core.py - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function fetch_open_data has 10 arguments (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def fetch_open_data(cls, ifo, start, end, sample_rate=4096,
Severity: Major
Found in gwpy/timeseries/core.py - About 45 mins to fix

Function __new__ has 9 arguments (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def __new__(cls, data, unit=None, t0=None, dt=None, sample_rate=None,
Severity: Major
Found in gwpy/timeseries/core.py - About 35 mins to fix

Function get has 9 arguments (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def get(cls, channel, start, end, pad=None, scaled=None,
Severity: Major
Found in gwpy/timeseries/core.py - About 35 mins to fix

Function find has 9 arguments (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def find(cls, channel, start, end, frametype=None, pad=None,
Severity: Major
Found in gwpy/timeseries/core.py - About 35 mins to fix

Function epoch has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def epoch(self, epoch):
        if epoch is None:
            del self.t0
        elif isinstance(epoch, Time):
            self.t0 = epoch.gps
Severity: Minor
Found in gwpy/timeseries/core.py - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status