Sign upLogin

gwpy/gwpy

View on GitHub
Star
gwpy/timeseries/io/gwf/framecpp.py

Summary

Maintainability
C
1 day
Test Coverage

Function read_gwf has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def read_gwf(filename, channels, start=None, end=None, scaled=None,
             ctype=None, series_class=TimeSeries):
    """Read a dict of series data from a single GWF file

    Parameters
Severity: Minor
Found in gwpy/timeseries/io/gwf/framecpp.py - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function read_frdata. (16)
Open

def read_frdata(frdata, epoch, start, end, scaled=True,
                series_class=TimeSeries):
    """Read a series from an `FrData` structure

    Parameters
Severity: Minor
Found in gwpy/timeseries/io/gwf/framecpp.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function read_gwf. (16)
Open

def read_gwf(filename, channels, start=None, end=None, scaled=None,
             ctype=None, series_class=TimeSeries):
    """Read a dict of series data from a single GWF file

    Parameters
Severity: Minor
Found in gwpy/timeseries/io/gwf/framecpp.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function write. (14)
Open

def write(tsdict, outfile,
          start=None, end=None,
          type=None,
          name='gwpy', run=0,
          compression='GZIP', compression_level=None):
Severity: Minor
Found in gwpy/timeseries/io/gwf/framecpp.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Function read_frdata has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def read_frdata(frdata, epoch, start, end, scaled=True,
                series_class=TimeSeries):
    """Read a series from an `FrData` structure

    Parameters
Severity: Minor
Found in gwpy/timeseries/io/gwf/framecpp.py - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function write has 9 arguments (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def write(tsdict, outfile,
Severity: Major
Found in gwpy/timeseries/io/gwf/framecpp.py - About 35 mins to fix

Function _read_channel has 9 arguments (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def _read_channel(stream, num, name, ctype, epoch, start, end,
Severity: Major
Found in gwpy/timeseries/io/gwf/framecpp.py - About 35 mins to fix

Function _get_frdata has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def _get_frdata(stream, num, name, ctype=None):
    """Brute force-ish method to return the FrData structure for a channel

    This saves on pulling the channel type from the TOC
    """
Severity: Minor
Found in gwpy/timeseries/io/gwf/framecpp.py - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function write has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def write(tsdict, outfile,
          start=None, end=None,
          type=None,
          name='gwpy', run=0,
          compression='GZIP', compression_level=None):
Severity: Minor
Found in gwpy/timeseries/io/gwf/framecpp.py - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function read has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def read(source, channels, start=None, end=None, scaled=None, type=None,
         series_class=TimeSeries):
    # pylint: disable=redefined-builtin
    """Read a dict of series from one or more GWF files
Severity: Minor
Found in gwpy/timeseries/io/gwf/framecpp.py - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function read_frvect has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def read_frvect(vect, epoch, start, end, name=None, series_class=TimeSeries):
    """Read an array from an `FrVect` structure

    Parameters
    ----------
Severity: Minor
Found in gwpy/timeseries/io/gwf/framecpp.py - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status