gwsumm/data/range.py

Summary

Maintainability
C
1 day
Test Coverage

Function get_range_spectrogram has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def get_range_spectrogram(channel, segments, config=None, cache=None,
                          query=True, nds=None, return_=True, nproc=1,
                          datafind_error='raise', frametype=None, stride=60,
                          fftlength=None, overlap=None, method=None,
                          **rangekwargs):
Severity: Minor
Found in gwsumm/data/range.py - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function get_range_spectrum. (12)
Open

@use_segmentlist
def get_range_spectrum(channel, segments, config=None, cache=None, query=True,
                       nds=None, return_=True, nproc=1, datafind_error='raise',
                       frametype=None, stride=60, fftlength=None, overlap=None,
                       method=None, which='all', state=None, **rangekwargs):
Severity: Minor
Found in gwsumm/data/range.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function get_range_spectrogram. (11)
Open

@use_segmentlist
def get_range_spectrogram(channel, segments, config=None, cache=None,
                          query=True, nds=None, return_=True, nproc=1,
                          datafind_error='raise', frametype=None, stride=60,
                          fftlength=None, overlap=None, method=None,
Severity: Minor
Found in gwsumm/data/range.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Function get_range_spectrum has 17 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def get_range_spectrum(channel, segments, config=None, cache=None, query=True,
Severity: Major
Found in gwsumm/data/range.py - About 2 hrs to fix

    Function get_range has 15 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def get_range(channel, segments, config=None, cache=None,
    Severity: Major
    Found in gwsumm/data/range.py - About 1 hr to fix

      Function get_range_spectrogram has 15 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      def get_range_spectrogram(channel, segments, config=None, cache=None,
      Severity: Major
      Found in gwsumm/data/range.py - About 1 hr to fix

        Function get_range_spectrum has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        def get_range_spectrum(channel, segments, config=None, cache=None, query=True,
                               nds=None, return_=True, nproc=1, datafind_error='raise',
                               frametype=None, stride=60, fftlength=None, overlap=None,
                               method=None, which='all', state=None, **rangekwargs):
            """Compute percentile spectra of the range integrand from a set of
        Severity: Minor
        Found in gwsumm/data/range.py - About 1 hr to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Avoid too many return statements within this function.
        Open

                return globalv.SPECTRUM[cmax]
        Severity: Major
        Found in gwsumm/data/range.py - About 30 mins to fix

          There are no issues that match your filters.

          Category
          Status