Function _get_spectrogram
has a Cognitive Complexity of 80 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _get_spectrogram(channel, segments, config=None, cache=None,
query=True, nds=None, format='power', return_=True,
frametype=None, nproc=1,
datafind_error='raise', **fftparams):
channel = get_channel(channel)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function _get_spectrogram. (39) Open
@use_segmentlist
def _get_spectrogram(channel, segments, config=None, cache=None,
query=True, nds=None, format='power', return_=True,
frametype=None, nproc=1,
datafind_error='raise', **fftparams):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.
Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:
Construct | Effect on CC | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
if | +1 | An if statement is a single decision. |
elif | +1 | The elif statement adds another decision. |
else | +0 | The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if. |
for | +1 | There is a decision at the start of the loop. |
while | +1 | There is a decision at the while statement. |
except | +1 | Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution. |
finally | +0 | The finally block is unconditionally executed. |
with | +1 | The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details). |
assert | +1 | The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement. |
Comprehension | +1 | A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop. |
Boolean Operator | +1 | Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point. |
Function _get_spectrum
has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _get_spectrum(channel, segments, config=None, cache=None, query=True,
nds=None, format='power', return_=True, which='all',
state=None, **fftparams):
"""Retrieve the time-series and generate a spectrum of the given
channel
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function _get_spectrum. (17) Open
def _get_spectrum(channel, segments, config=None, cache=None, query=True,
nds=None, format='power', return_=True, which='all',
state=None, **fftparams):
"""Retrieve the time-series and generate a spectrum of the given
channel
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.
Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:
Construct | Effect on CC | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
if | +1 | An if statement is a single decision. |
elif | +1 | The elif statement adds another decision. |
else | +0 | The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if. |
for | +1 | There is a decision at the start of the loop. |
while | +1 | There is a decision at the while statement. |
except | +1 | Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution. |
finally | +0 | The finally block is unconditionally executed. |
with | +1 | The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details). |
assert | +1 | The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement. |
Comprehension | +1 | A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop. |
Boolean Operator | +1 | Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point. |
File spectral.py
has 317 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
# Copyright (C) Duncan Macleod (2013)
#
# This file is part of GWSumm.
#
Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function get_spectrograms. (11) Open
@use_segmentlist
def get_spectrograms(channels, segments, config=None, cache=None, query=True,
nds=None, format='power', return_=True, frametype=None,
nproc=1, datafind_error='raise', **fftparams):
"""Get spectrograms for multiple channels
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.
Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:
Construct | Effect on CC | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
if | +1 | An if statement is a single decision. |
elif | +1 | The elif statement adds another decision. |
else | +0 | The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if. |
for | +1 | There is a decision at the start of the loop. |
while | +1 | There is a decision at the while statement. |
except | +1 | Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution. |
finally | +0 | The finally block is unconditionally executed. |
with | +1 | The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details). |
assert | +1 | The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement. |
Comprehension | +1 | A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop. |
Boolean Operator | +1 | Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point. |
Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function get_spectrum. (7) Open
@use_segmentlist
def get_spectrum(channel, segments, config=None, cache=None,
query=True, nds=None, format='power', return_=True,
frametype=None, nproc=1, datafind_error='raise',
state=None, **fftparams):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.
Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:
Construct | Effect on CC | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
if | +1 | An if statement is a single decision. |
elif | +1 | The elif statement adds another decision. |
else | +0 | The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if. |
for | +1 | There is a decision at the start of the loop. |
while | +1 | There is a decision at the while statement. |
except | +1 | Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution. |
finally | +0 | The finally block is unconditionally executed. |
with | +1 | The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details). |
assert | +1 | The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement. |
Comprehension | +1 | A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop. |
Boolean Operator | +1 | Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point. |
Function get_spectrum
has 13 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_spectrum(channel, segments, config=None, cache=None,
Function get_spectrograms
has 12 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_spectrograms(channels, segments, config=None, cache=None, query=True,
Function _get_spectrogram
has 12 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _get_spectrogram(channel, segments, config=None, cache=None,
Function get_spectrogram
has 12 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_spectrogram(channel, segments, config=None, cache=None,
Function _get_spectrum
has 11 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _get_spectrum(channel, segments, config=None, cache=None, query=True,
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return globalv.SPECTRUM[cmax]
Function get_spectrograms
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_spectrograms(channels, segments, config=None, cache=None, query=True,
nds=None, format='power', return_=True, frametype=None,
nproc=1, datafind_error='raise', **fftparams):
"""Get spectrograms for multiple channels
"""
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
FIXME found Open
# XXX FIXME: this corrects the bias offset in Rayleigh
- Exclude checks
XXX found Open
# XXX FIXME: this corrects the bias offset in Rayleigh
- Exclude checks