Sign upLogin

hackedteam/core-android-market

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 566 of 566 total issues

Function _createNode has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def _createNode( self, tag, **kwargs ):
        result = self.boostbook.createElement(tag)
        for k in kwargs.keys():
            if kwargs[k] != '':
                if k == 'id':
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libbson/boost/boost_1_53_0/tools/build/v2/tools/doxproc.py - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function builds has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def builds(metatarget_reference, project, ps, what):
    # Attempt to build a metatarget named by 'metatarget-reference'
    # in context of 'project' with properties 'ps'.
    # Returns non-empty value if build is OK.
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libbson/boost/boost_1_53_0/tools/build/v2/build/configure.py - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function set_library_order has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def set_library_order (manager, sources, prop_set, result):
    used_libraries = []
    deps = prop_set.dependency ()

    sources.extend(d.value() for d in deps)
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libbson/boost/boost_1_53_0/tools/build/v2/tools/unix.py - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function grist has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def grist (self):
        """Helper to 'actual_name', above. Compute unique prefix used to distinguish
            this target from other targets with the same name which create different
            file.
        """
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libbson/boost/boost_1_53_0/tools/build/v2/build/virtual_target.py - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function composeEmail has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def composeEmail(self, report):
        """
        Composes an e-mail to this platform maintainer if one or more of
        the platforms s/he maintains has a large number of failures.
        Returns the e-mail text if a message needs to be sent, or None
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libbson/boost/boost_1_53_0/tools/regression/xsl_reports/email_maintainers.py - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function get_tarball has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def get_tarball( self, *args ):
        if not args or args == []:
            args = [ 'download', 'unpack' ]

        tarball_path = None
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libbson/boost/boost_1_53_0/tools/regression/src/regression.py - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function command_get_tools has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def command_get_tools(self):
        #~ Get Boost.Build v2...
        self.log( 'Getting Boost.Build v2...' )
        if self.user and self.user != '':
            os.chdir( os.path.dirname(self.tools_bb_root) )
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libbson/boost/boost_1_53_0/tools/regression/src/regression.py - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function copy_comments has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def copy_comments( results_xml, comment_file ):
    results_xml.startElement( 'comment', {} )

    if os.path.exists( comment_file ):
        utils.log( 'Reading comments file "%s"...' % comment_file )
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libbson/boost/boost_1_53_0/tools/regression/src/collect_and_upload_logs.py - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def __init__(self, name):
        self.name = name
        self.failures = list()
        self.maintainers = list()
        return
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libbson/boost/boost_1_53_0/tools/regression/xsl_reports/email_maintainers.py and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
src/libbson/boost/boost_1_53_0/tools/regression/xsl_reports/email_maintainers.py on lines 95..99

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 33.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    map( lambda x: options.__setitem__( x[0], x[1] ), option_pairs )
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libbson/boost/boost_1_53_0/tools/regression/xsl_reports/utils/accept_args.py and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
src/libbson/boost/boost_1_53_0/tools/build/v2/tools/doxproc.py on lines 51..51

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 33.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    map( lambda x: options.__setitem__( x[0], x[1] ), option_pairs )
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libbson/boost/boost_1_53_0/tools/build/v2/tools/doxproc.py and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
src/libbson/boost/boost_1_53_0/tools/regression/xsl_reports/utils/accept_args.py on lines 11..11

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 33.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def __init__(self, name):
        self.name = name
        self.maintainers = list()
        self.tests = list()
        return
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libbson/boost/boost_1_53_0/tools/regression/xsl_reports/email_maintainers.py and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
src/libbson/boost/boost_1_53_0/tools/regression/xsl_reports/email_maintainers.py on lines 31..35

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 33.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        if (boost_math.any_distribution.third_param_name(i).Length.CompareTo(0) != 0)
        { // Is a 3rd parameter.
          sw.WriteLine(parameterLabel3.Text + separator + this.parameter3.Text);
        }
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libbson/boost/boost_1_53_0/libs/math/dot_net_example/distribution_explorer/DistexForm.cs and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
src/libbson/boost/boost_1_53_0/libs/math/dot_net_example/distribution_explorer/DistexForm.cs on lines 397..400

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 62.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        if (boost_math.any_distribution.second_param_name(i).Length.CompareTo(0) != 0)
        { // Is a 2nd parameter.
          sw.WriteLine(parameterLabel2.Text + separator +  this.parameter2.Text);
        }
Severity: Minor
Found in src/libbson/boost/boost_1_53_0/libs/math/dot_net_example/distribution_explorer/DistexForm.cs and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
src/libbson/boost/boost_1_53_0/libs/math/dot_net_example/distribution_explorer/DistexForm.cs on lines 401..404

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 62.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Avoid too many return statements within this function.
Open

    return True
Severity: Major
Found in src/libbson/boost/boost_1_53_0/tools/build/v2/build/feature.py - About 30 mins to fix

    Avoid too many return statements within this function.
    Open

                return 0
    Severity: Major
    Found in src/libbson/boost/boost_1_53_0/tools/build/v2/build/property.py - About 30 mins to fix

      Avoid too many return statements within this function.
      Open

          return True
      Severity: Major
      Found in src/libbson/boost/boost_1_53_0/tools/build/v2/build/feature.py - About 30 mins to fix

        Avoid too many return statements within this function.
        Open

                    return 1
        Severity: Major
        Found in src/libbson/boost/boost_1_53_0/tools/build/v2/build/property.py - About 30 mins to fix

          Avoid too many return statements within this function.
          Open

                  return best
          Severity: Major
          Found in src/libbson/boost/boost_1_53_0/tools/build/v2/build/targets.py - About 30 mins to fix

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                    self.manager_.targets().log(
            "Building project '%s' with '%s'" % (self.name (), str(ps)))
            Severity: Minor
            Found in src/libbson/boost/boost_1_53_0/tools/build/v2/build/targets.py and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
            src/libbson/boost/boost_1_53_0/tools/build/v2/build/targets.py on lines 1177..1179

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 32.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Severity
            Category
            Status
            Source
            Language