hackedteam/core-blackberry

View on GitHub
bb-tools/proguard4.7/src/proguard/gui/MemberSpecificationDialog.java

Summary

Maintainability
D
1 day
Test Coverage

File MemberSpecificationDialog.java has 340 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

/*
 * ProGuard -- shrinking, optimization, obfuscation, and preverification
 *             of Java bytecode.
 *
 * Copyright (c) 2002-2011 Eric Lafortune (eric@graphics.cornell.edu)
Severity: Minor
Found in bb-tools/proguard4.7/src/proguard/gui/MemberSpecificationDialog.java - About 4 hrs to fix

    Method getMemberSpecification has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        public MemberSpecification getMemberSpecification()
        {
            String annotationType = annotationTypeTextField.getText();
            String name           = nameTextField.getText();
            String type           = typeTextField.getText();

      Method getMemberSpecification has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          public MemberSpecification getMemberSpecification()
          {
              String annotationType = annotationTypeTextField.getText();
              String name           = nameTextField.getText();
              String type           = typeTextField.getText();

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method setMemberSpecification has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          public void setMemberSpecification(MemberSpecification memberSpecification)
          {
              String annotationType = memberSpecification.annotationType;
              String name           = memberSpecification.name;
              String descriptor     = memberSpecification.descriptor;

        Method addRadioButtonTriplet has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            private JRadioButton[] addRadioButtonTriplet(String labelText,
                                                         JPanel panel)
            {
                GridBagConstraints labelConstraints = new GridBagConstraints();
                labelConstraints.anchor = GridBagConstraints.WEST;

          Method setMemberSpecificationRadioButtons has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              private void setMemberSpecificationRadioButtons(MemberSpecification memberSpecification,
                                                              int                 flag,
                                                              JRadioButton[]      radioButtons)
              {
                  if (radioButtons != null)
          Severity: Minor
          Found in bb-tools/proguard4.7/src/proguard/gui/MemberSpecificationDialog.java - About 25 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

              private JRadioButton[] addRadioButtonTriplet(String labelText,
                                                           JPanel panel)
              {
                  GridBagConstraints labelConstraints = new GridBagConstraints();
                  labelConstraints.anchor = GridBagConstraints.WEST;
          bb-tools/proguard4.7/src/proguard/gui/ClassSpecificationDialog.java on lines 309..347

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 217.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  {
                      int index = (memberSpecification.requiredSetAccessFlags   & flag) != 0 ? 0 :
                                  (memberSpecification.requiredUnsetAccessFlags & flag) != 0 ? 1 :
                                                                                                 2;
                      radioButtons[index].setSelected(true);
          bb-tools/proguard4.7/src/proguard/gui/ClassSpecificationDialog.java on lines 496..504

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 57.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  {
                      if      (radioButtons[0].isSelected())
                      {
                          memberSpecification.requiredSetAccessFlags   |= flag;
                      }
          bb-tools/proguard4.7/src/proguard/gui/ClassSpecificationDialog.java on lines 511..523

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 45.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          There are no issues that match your filters.

          Category
          Status