File CodePreverifier.java
has 380 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*
* ProGuard -- shrinking, optimization, obfuscation, and preverification
* of Java bytecode.
*
* Copyright (c) 2002-2011 Eric Lafortune (eric@graphics.cornell.edu)
Method visitCodeAttribute0
has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void visitCodeAttribute0(Clazz clazz, Method method, CodeAttribute codeAttribute)
{
// DEBUG =
// clazz.getName().equals("abc/Def") &&
// method.getName(clazz).equals("abc");
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method visitCodeAttribute0
has 97 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void visitCodeAttribute0(Clazz clazz, Method method, CodeAttribute codeAttribute)
{
// DEBUG =
// clazz.getName().equals("abc/Def") &&
// method.getName(clazz).equals("abc");
Method correspondingVerificationType
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private VerificationType correspondingVerificationType(ProgramClass programClass,
ProgramMethod programMethod,
CodeAttribute codeAttribute,
int offset,
boolean isVariable0,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method correspondingVerificationTypes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private VerificationType[] correspondingVerificationTypes(ProgramClass programClass,
ProgramMethod programMethod,
CodeAttribute codeAttribute,
int offset,
TracedVariables variables)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method compressStackMapFrames
has 51 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private void compressStackMapFrames(VerificationType[] initialVariableTypes,
List stackMapFrameList)
{
int previousVariablesCount = initialVariableTypes.length;
VerificationType[] previousVariableTypes = initialVariableTypes;
Method correspondingVerificationType
has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private VerificationType correspondingVerificationType(ProgramClass programClass,
ProgramMethod programMethod,
CodeAttribute codeAttribute,
int offset,
boolean isVariable0,
Method correspondingVerificationTypes
has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private VerificationType[] correspondingVerificationTypes(ProgramClass programClass,
ProgramMethod programMethod,
CodeAttribute codeAttribute,
int offset,
TracedVariables variables)
Method compressStackMapFrames
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private void compressStackMapFrames(VerificationType[] initialVariableTypes,
List stackMapFrameList)
{
int previousVariablesCount = initialVariableTypes.length;
VerificationType[] previousVariableTypes = initialVariableTypes;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method correspondingVerificationTypes
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private VerificationType[] correspondingVerificationTypes(ProgramClass programClass,
ProgramMethod programMethod,
CodeAttribute codeAttribute,
int offset,
TracedStack stack)
Method correspondingVerificationType
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private VerificationType correspondingVerificationType(ProgramClass programClass,
ProgramMethod programMethod,
CodeAttribute codeAttribute,
int offset,
boolean isVariable0,
Method correspondingVerificationTypes
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private VerificationType[] correspondingVerificationTypes(ProgramClass programClass,
ProgramMethod programMethod,
CodeAttribute codeAttribute,
int offset,
TracedStack stack)
Method correspondingVerificationTypes
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private VerificationType[] correspondingVerificationTypes(ProgramClass programClass,
ProgramMethod programMethod,
CodeAttribute codeAttribute,
int offset,
TracedVariables variables)
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return VerificationTypeFactory.createObjectType(createClassConstant(programClass, referenceValue));
Method correspondingVerificationTypes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private VerificationType[] correspondingVerificationTypes(ProgramClass programClass,
ProgramMethod programMethod,
CodeAttribute codeAttribute,
int offset,
TracedStack stack)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method equalVerificationTypes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private boolean equalVerificationTypes(VerificationType[] types1,
VerificationType[] types2,
int length)
{
if (length > 0 &&
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public void visitCodeAttribute(Clazz clazz, Method method, CodeAttribute codeAttribute)
{
// TODO: Remove this when the preverifier has stabilized.
// Catch any unexpected exceptions from the actual visiting method.
try
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 120.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76