hackedteam/core-blackberry

View on GitHub
bb-tools/proguard4.7/src/proguard/util/VariableStringMatcher.java

Summary

Maintainability
B
4 hrs
Test Coverage

Method isAllowedCharacter has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private boolean isAllowedCharacter(char character)
    {
        // Check the allowed characters.
        if (allowedCharacters != null)
        {
Severity: Minor
Found in bb-tools/proguard4.7/src/proguard/util/VariableStringMatcher.java - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method matches has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public boolean matches(String string)
    {
        if (string.length() < minimumLength)
        {
            return false;
Severity: Minor
Found in bb-tools/proguard4.7/src/proguard/util/VariableStringMatcher.java - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Avoid too many return statements within this method.
Open

        return nextMatcher.matches(string.substring(maximumLength));
Severity: Major
Found in bb-tools/proguard4.7/src/proguard/util/VariableStringMatcher.java - About 30 mins to fix

    Similar blocks of code found in 16 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

        public VariableStringMatcher(char[]        allowedCharacters,
                                     char[]        disallowedCharacters,
                                     int           minimumLength,
                                     int           maximumLength,
                                     StringMatcher nextMatcher)
    bb-tools/proguard4.7/src/proguard/KeepClassSpecification.java on lines 50..61
    bb-tools/proguard4.7/src/proguard/MemberSpecification.java on lines 71..82
    bb-tools/proguard4.7/src/proguard/classfile/ProgramMember.java on lines 58..69
    bb-tools/proguard4.7/src/proguard/classfile/attribute/LocalVariableInfo.java on lines 59..70
    bb-tools/proguard4.7/src/proguard/classfile/attribute/LocalVariableTypeInfo.java on lines 60..71
    bb-tools/proguard4.7/src/proguard/classfile/attribute/preverification/FullFrame.java on lines 66..77
    bb-tools/proguard4.7/src/proguard/classfile/instruction/TableSwitchInstruction.java on lines 48..59
    bb-tools/proguard4.7/src/proguard/classfile/util/ClassReferenceInitializer.java on lines 78..89
    bb-tools/proguard4.7/src/proguard/classfile/util/DynamicMemberReferenceInitializer.java on lines 520..531
    bb-tools/proguard4.7/src/proguard/classfile/visitor/ClassHierarchyTraveler.java on lines 56..68
    bb-tools/proguard4.7/src/proguard/classfile/visitor/MethodImplementationTraveler.java on lines 57..68
    bb-tools/proguard4.7/src/proguard/gui/splash/ImageSprite.java on lines 47..58
    bb-tools/proguard4.7/src/proguard/gui/splash/ShadowedSprite.java on lines 51..62
    bb-tools/proguard4.7/src/proguard/io/ClassReader.java on lines 55..66
    bb-tools/proguard4.7/src/proguard/retrace/ReTrace.java on lines 659..666

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 60.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

            if (disallowedCharacters != null)
            {
                for (int index = 0; index < disallowedCharacters.length; index++)
                {
                    if (disallowedCharacters[index] == character)
    bb-tools/proguard4.7/src/proguard/evaluation/value/InstructionOffsetValue.java on lines 74..83

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 50.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    There are no issues that match your filters.

    Category
    Status