hackedteam/rcs-db

View on GitHub
scripts/rcs-kill.rb

Summary

Maintainability
D
3 days
Test Coverage

File rcs-kill.rb has 517 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

require 'singleton'
require 'pp'
require 'optparse'
require 'openssl'

Severity: Major
Found in scripts/rcs-kill.rb - About 1 day to fix

    Method run has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def run(options)
    
        return analyze(options[:analyze]) if options[:analyze]
    
        $local_address = options[:ip]
    Severity: Minor
    Found in scripts/rcs-kill.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method run! has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def self.run!(*argv)
    
        # This hash will hold all of the options parsed from the command-line by OptionParser.
        options = {}
    
    
    Severity: Minor
    Found in scripts/rcs-kill.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Method run has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def run(options)
      
          return analyze(options[:analyze]) if options[:analyze]
      
          $local_address = options[:ip]
      Severity: Minor
      Found in scripts/rcs-kill.rb - About 1 hr to fix

        Method analyze_unknown has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

          def analyze_unknown(sample)
            offset = nil
            $watermark_table.keys.each do |k|
              offset = sample.index(k)
              if offset
        Severity: Minor
        Found in scripts/rcs-kill.rb - About 1 hr to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Avoid too many return statements within this method.
        Open

            return 5.1 if compare_offset(binary, 0x21946, 5)
        Severity: Major
        Found in scripts/rcs-kill.rb - About 30 mins to fix

          Avoid too many return statements within this method.
          Open

              return "unknown"
          Severity: Major
          Found in scripts/rcs-kill.rb - About 30 mins to fix

            Avoid too many return statements within this method.
            Open

                return 6 if compare_offset(binary, 0x21c52, 6)
            Severity: Major
            Found in scripts/rcs-kill.rb - About 30 mins to fix

              Method analyze_scout_v2 has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

                def analyze_scout_v2(sample)
                  # Click to start the program
                  marker = "\x43\x00\x6C\x00\x69\x00\x63\x00\x6B\x00\x20\x00\x74\x00\x6F\x00\x20\x00\x73\x00\x74\x00\x61\x00\x72\x00\x74\x00\x20\x00\x74\x00\x68\x00\x65\x00\x20\x00\x70\x00\x72\x00\x6F\x00\x67\x00\x72\x00\x61\x00\x6D\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00" 
                  offset = sample.index(marker) 
                  raise "marker for watermark not found" unless offset
              Severity: Minor
              Found in scripts/rcs-kill.rb - About 25 mins to fix

              Cognitive Complexity

              Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

              A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

              • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
              • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
              • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

              Further reading

              Method detect_version has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

                def detect_version(binary)
                  return 1 if compare_offset(binary, 0x20714, 1)
                  return 2 if compare_offset(binary, 0x20868, 2)
                  return 3 if compare_offset(binary, 0x21518, 3)
                  return 5 if compare_offset(binary, 0x21956, 5)
              Severity: Minor
              Found in scripts/rcs-kill.rb - About 25 mins to fix

              Cognitive Complexity

              Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

              A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

              • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
              • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
              • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

              Further reading

              Method analyze_scout_v1 has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

                def analyze_scout_v1(sample)
                  # Click to start the program
                  marker = "\x43\x00\x6C\x00\x69\x00\x63\x00\x6B\x00\x20\x00\x74\x00\x6F\x00\x20\x00\x73\x00\x74\x00\x61\x00\x72\x00\x74\x00\x20\x00\x74\x00\x68\x00\x65\x00\x20\x00\x70\x00\x72\x00\x6F\x00\x67\x00\x72\x00\x61\x00\x6D\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00" 
                  offset = sample.index(marker) 
                  raise "marker for watermark not found" unless offset
              Severity: Minor
              Found in scripts/rcs-kill.rb - About 25 mins to fix

              Cognitive Complexity

              Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

              A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

              • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
              • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
              • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

              Further reading

              Method analyze_scout_v3 has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

                def analyze_scout_v3(sample)
                  # Click to start the program
                  marker = "\x43\x00\x6C\x00\x69\x00\x63\x00\x6B\x00\x20\x00\x74\x00\x6F\x00\x20\x00\x73\x00\x74\x00\x61\x00\x72\x00\x74\x00\x20\x00\x74\x00\x68\x00\x65\x00\x20\x00\x70\x00\x72\x00\x6F\x00\x67\x00\x72\x00\x61\x00\x6D\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00"
                  offset = sample.index(marker)
                  raise "marker for watermark not found" unless offset
              Severity: Minor
              Found in scripts/rcs-kill.rb - About 25 mins to fix

              Cognitive Complexity

              Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

              A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

              • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
              • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
              • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

              Further reading

              Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

                def analyze_scout_v2(sample)
                  # Click to start the program
                  marker = "\x43\x00\x6C\x00\x69\x00\x63\x00\x6B\x00\x20\x00\x74\x00\x6F\x00\x20\x00\x73\x00\x74\x00\x61\x00\x72\x00\x74\x00\x20\x00\x74\x00\x68\x00\x65\x00\x20\x00\x70\x00\x72\x00\x6F\x00\x67\x00\x72\x00\x61\x00\x6D\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00" 
                  offset = sample.index(marker) 
                  raise "marker for watermark not found" unless offset
              Severity: Major
              Found in scripts/rcs-kill.rb and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
              scripts/rcs-kill.rb on lines 300..324

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 95.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

                def analyze_scout_v3(sample)
                  # Click to start the program
                  marker = "\x43\x00\x6C\x00\x69\x00\x63\x00\x6B\x00\x20\x00\x74\x00\x6F\x00\x20\x00\x73\x00\x74\x00\x61\x00\x72\x00\x74\x00\x20\x00\x74\x00\x68\x00\x65\x00\x20\x00\x70\x00\x72\x00\x6F\x00\x67\x00\x72\x00\x61\x00\x6D\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00"
                  offset = sample.index(marker)
                  raise "marker for watermark not found" unless offset
              Severity: Major
              Found in scripts/rcs-kill.rb and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
              scripts/rcs-kill.rb on lines 273..297

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 95.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              There are no issues that match your filters.

              Category
              Status