hackedteam/test-av2

View on GitHub
AVMaster/report.py

Summary

Maintainability
D
1 day
Test Coverage

Function summary has a Cognitive Complexity of 47 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def summary():
    report = Report()
    report.vm = {}

    hostname = helper.get_hostname()
Severity: Minor
Found in AVMaster/report.py - About 7 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function dump has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def dump():
    report = Report()

    #f=open("%s/report.%s.%s.yaml" % (logger.logdir, report.timestamp, report.name), "w+")
    #f.write(yaml.dump(report, default_flow_style=False, indent=4))
Severity: Minor
Found in AVMaster/report.py - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
Open

                    if  current_proc not in failed_kind:
                        failed_kind[current_proc] = []
                    failed_kind[current_proc].append(vm)
Severity: Major
Found in AVMaster/report.py - About 45 mins to fix

    Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
    Open

                        if cmd.success == False:
                            summary+="        %s\n" % (str(cmd))
                        elif cmd.name in important_commands and cmd.success:
                            #check = ['+ ERROR','+ FAILED']
                            #errors = any([ s in c for s in check ])
    Severity: Major
    Found in AVMaster/report.py - About 45 mins to fix

      Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
      Open

                          if vm not in failed:
                              failed[vm] = []
                          if  current_proc not in failed_kind:
      Severity: Major
      Found in AVMaster/report.py - About 45 mins to fix

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            if os.path.exists(sym_sum_name):
                logging.debug("removing: %s" % sym_sum_name)
                os.remove(sym_sum_name)
        Severity: Minor
        Found in AVMaster/report.py and 1 other location - About 50 mins to fix
        AVMaster/report.py on lines 274..276

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 36.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            if os.path.exists(sym_rep_name):
                logging.debug("removing: %s" % sym_rep_name)
                os.remove(sym_rep_name)
        Severity: Minor
        Found in AVMaster/report.py and 1 other location - About 50 mins to fix
        AVMaster/report.py on lines 280..282

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 36.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            if config.verbose:
                logging.debug("received (%s): %s (%s)" % (report.current_procedure.get(av,""), av, cmd))
        Severity: Minor
        Found in AVMaster/report.py and 1 other location - About 40 mins to fix
        AVMaster/report.py on lines 209..210

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 34.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            if config.verbose:
                logging.debug("sent (%s): %s (%s)" % (report.current_procedure.get(av,""), av, cmd))
        Severity: Minor
        Found in AVMaster/report.py and 1 other location - About 40 mins to fix
        AVMaster/report.py on lines 223..224

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 34.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        There are no issues that match your filters.

        Category
        Status