hackedteam/test-av2

View on GitHub

Showing 446 of 446 total issues

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        html_table = html_table.replace("AV_TXT_LINK","results_%s_%s.txt" % (s['av'],s['kind']) )
Severity: Minor
Found in snippet/report_html.py and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
snippet/report_html.py on lines 76..76

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 33.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Function client has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def client():
    r = Redis()
    p = r.pubsub()
    p.subscribe(channel)
    exit = False
Severity: Minor
Found in snippet/listener.py - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function execute_web_expl has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def execute_web_expl(self, websrv):
        """ WEBZ: we need to download some files only """

        def check_file(filename):
            try:
Severity: Minor
Found in AVAgent/build.py - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        html_table = html_table.replace("AV_SCREEN_LINK","screenshot_%s_%s.png" % (s['av'],s['kind']) )
Severity: Minor
Found in snippet/report_html.py and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
snippet/report_html.py on lines 75..75

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 33.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        smtp.sendmail(msg["From"], msg["To"].split(","), msg.as_string())
Severity: Minor
Found in scripts/check_infected.py and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
AVMaster/lib/core/report.py on lines 177..177

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 33.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        if device:
            proc = subprocess.Popen(
                [adb_path, "shell", "rilcap qzx '" + cmd + "'"], stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
Severity: Minor
Found in scripts/mobile/hardware/adb.py and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
scripts/mobile/hardware/adb.py on lines 313..317

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 33.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Function build has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def build(args, report):
    global results, report_send
    results = []

    report_send = report
Severity: Minor
Found in AVAgent/build.py - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Avoid too many return statements within this function.
Open

        return "skype call not supported by OS"
Severity: Major
Found in scripts/mobile/hardware/test_skype.py - About 30 mins to fix

    Avoid too many return statements within this function.
    Open

            return "NO-VM-TOOLS"
    Severity: Major
    Found in AVCommon/commands/server/START_VM.py - About 30 mins to fix

      Avoid too many return statements within this function.
      Open

              return "%s, ERROR: not updated. Reason: %s" % (vm_name, e)
      Severity: Major
      Found in AVMaster/Old/oldMaster.py - About 30 mins to fix

        Avoid too many return statements within this function.
        Open

            return True
        Severity: Major
        Found in scripts/mobile/hardware/main.py - About 30 mins to fix

          Avoid too many return statements within this function.
          Open

                  return
          Severity: Major
          Found in scripts/mobile/hardware/test_skype.py - About 30 mins to fix

            Avoid too many return statements within this function.
            Open

                    return
            Severity: Major
            Found in scripts/mobile/hardware/test_skype.py - About 30 mins to fix

              Avoid too many return statements within this function.
              Open

                  return False, "Error Occurred: Timeout while starting VM"
              Severity: Major
              Found in AVCommon/commands/server/START_VM.py - About 30 mins to fix

                Avoid too many return statements within this function.
                Open

                            return dispatch_kind(vm_name, kind, args, result_id, tries)
                Severity: Major
                Found in AVMaster/Old/oldMaster.py - About 30 mins to fix

                  Avoid too many return statements within this function.
                  Open

                          return "%s, ERROR: not updated. Reason: %s" % (vm_name, e)
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in AVMaster/master.py - About 30 mins to fix

                    Avoid too many return statements within this function.
                    Open

                        return True
                    Severity: Major
                    Found in scripts/mobile/hardware/monkeymain.py - About 30 mins to fix

                      Avoid too many return statements within this function.
                      Open

                          return True
                      Severity: Major
                      Found in scripts/mobile/hardware/test_skype.py - About 30 mins to fix

                        Avoid too many return statements within this function.
                        Open

                                return
                        Severity: Major
                        Found in scripts/mobile/hardware/test_skype.py - About 30 mins to fix

                          Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
                          Open

                                  if len(devices) > 1:
                                      dev = raw_input("su quale device si vuole eseguire il test? ")
                                      print "Eseguo il test su %s" % dev
                          Severity: Major
                          Found in scripts/mobile/hardware/test_skype.py and 4 other locations - About 30 mins to fix
                          scripts/mobile/hardware/main.py on lines 218..220
                          scripts/mobile/hardware/monkeymain.py on lines 216..218
                          scripts/mobile/hardware/testmain.py on lines 55..57
                          scripts/mobile/hardware/testtools.py on lines 40..42

                          Duplicated Code

                          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                          Tuning

                          This issue has a mass of 32.

                          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                          Refactorings

                          Further Reading

                          Severity
                          Category
                          Status
                          Source
                          Language