Function _reconstruct has a Cognitive Complexity of 42 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _reconstruct(x, info, deep, memo=None):
if isinstance(info, str):
return x
assert isinstance(info, tuple)
if memo is None:- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File copy.py has 374 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
"""Generic (shallow and deep) copying operations.
Interface summary:
import copyFunction deepcopy has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def deepcopy(x, memo=None, _nil=[]):
"""Deep copy operation on arbitrary Python objects.
See the module's __doc__ string for more info.
"""- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _test has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _test():
l = [None, 1, 2L, 3.14, 'xyzzy', (1, 2L), [3.14, 'abc'],
{'abc': 'ABC'}, (), [], {}]
l1 = copy(l)
print l1==lFunction copy has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def copy(x):
"""Shallow copy operation on arbitrary Python objects.
See the module's __doc__ string for more info.
"""- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if reductor:
rv = reductor(2)
else:
reductor = getattr(x, "__reduce__", None)
if reductor:Function _deepcopy_inst has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _deepcopy_inst(x, memo):
if hasattr(x, '__deepcopy__'):
return x.__deepcopy__(memo)
if hasattr(x, '__getinitargs__'):
args = x.__getinitargs__()- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _copy_inst has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _copy_inst(x):
if hasattr(x, '__copy__'):
return x.__copy__()
if hasattr(x, '__getinitargs__'):
args = x.__getinitargs__()- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _deepcopy_tuple has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _deepcopy_tuple(x, memo):
y = []
for a in x:
y.append(deepcopy(a, memo))
d = id(x)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 2585.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76