Function _compile
has a Cognitive Complexity of 92 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _compile(code, pattern, flags):
# internal: compile a (sub)pattern
emit = code.append
_len = len
LITERAL_CODES = _LITERAL_CODES
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _compile_info
has a Cognitive Complexity of 82 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _compile_info(code, pattern, flags):
# internal: compile an info block. in the current version,
# this contains min/max pattern width, and an optional literal
# prefix or a character map
lo, hi = pattern.getwidth()
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File sre_compile.py
has 424 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
#
# Secret Labs' Regular Expression Engine
#
# convert template to internal format
#
Function _optimize_charset
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _optimize_charset(charset, fixup):
# internal: optimize character set
out = []
outappend = out.append
charmap = [0]*256
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _optimize_unicode
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _optimize_unicode(charset, fixup):
try:
import array
except ImportError:
return charset
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _compile_charset
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _compile_charset(charset, flags, code, fixup=None):
# compile charset subprogram
emit = code.append
if fixup is None:
fixup = _identityfunction
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for p in av[1]:
if not p:
break
op, av = p[0]
if op is LITERAL:
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if op is LITERAL:
cappend((op, av))
else:
break
else:
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if not p:
break
op, av = p[0]
Function _mk_bitmap
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _mk_bitmap(bits):
data = []
dataappend = data.append
if _sre.CODESIZE == 2:
start = (1, 0)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return charset
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return [(BIGCHARSET, data)]
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 4354.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76