Showing 77 of 77 total issues
Method handle_ruby_multiline
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def handle_ruby_multiline(line)
line.text.rstrip!
return line unless is_ruby_multiline?(line.text)
begin
# Use already fetched @next_line in the first loop. Otherwise, fetch next
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def compile_class!(temple, key, values)
build_code = attribute_builder(:class, values)
if values.all? { |type, exp| type == :static || Temple::StaticAnalyzer.static?(exp) }
temple << [:html, :attr, key, [:static, eval(build_code).to_s]]
else
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 39.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def compile_id!(temple, key, values)
build_code = attribute_builder(:id, values)
if values.all? { |type, exp| type == :static || Temple::StaticAnalyzer.static?(exp) }
temple << [:html, :attr, key, [:static, eval(build_code).to_s]]
else
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 39.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
unless (flat? && !closes_flat?(line) && !closes_flat?(@line)) ||
(line_defined && @line.text[0] == ?: && line.full =~ %r[^#{@line.full[/^\s+/]}\s])
return next_line if line.text.empty?
handle_multiline(line)
Method build
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build(escape_attrs, quote, format, object_ref, *hashes)
Method parse_class_and_id
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.parse_class_and_id(list)
attributes = {}
return attributes if list.empty?
list.scan(/([#.])([-:_a-zA-Z0-9\@]+)/) do |type, property|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method try_parse_haml_emacs_magic_comment
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def try_parse_haml_emacs_magic_comment(scanner)
pos = scanner.pos
return unless scanner.scan(/.*?-\*-\s*/n)
# From Ruby's parse.y
return unless scanner.scan(/([^\s'":;]+)\s*:\s*("(?:\\.|[^"])*"|[^"\s;]+?)[\s;]*-\*-/n)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_key!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_key!(tokens)
_, type, str = tokens.shift
case type
when :on_sp
parse_key!(tokens)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method merge_all_attrs
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def merge_all_attrs(hashes)
merged = {}
hashes.each do |hash|
unless hash.is_a?(Hash)
raise ArgumentError, "Non-hash object is given to attributes!"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method plain
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def plain(line, escape_html = nil)
if block_opened?
raise SyntaxError.new(Error.message(:illegal_nesting_plain), @next_line.index)
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method comment
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def comment(text)
if text[0..1] == '!['
revealed = true
text = text[1..-1]
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method compile
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def compile(code)
[].tap do |exps|
tokens = Ripper.lex(code.strip)
tokens.pop while tokens.last && [:on_comment, :on_sp].include?(tokens.last[1])
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method compile
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def compile(node, &block)
temple = [:multi]
return temple if node.children.empty?
temple << [:whitespace] if prepend_whitespace?(node)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method check_encoding
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def check_encoding(str)
if str.valid_encoding?
# Get rid of the Unicode BOM if possible
# Shortcut for UTF-8 which might be the majority case
if str.encoding == Encoding::UTF_8
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return unless scanner.scan(/\s*(?:,|$)\s*/)
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return name, [:dynamic, var]
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return name, [:static, content.first[1]] if content.size == 1
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return name, [:dynamic,
%!"#{content.each_with_object(''.dup) {|(t, v), s| s << (t == :str ? Util.inspect_obj(v)[1...-1] : "\#{#{v}}")}}"!]
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return push plain(line.strip!(1), false) if line.text[1] == ?\s || line.text[1..2] == '#{'
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return push plain(line.strip!(2)) if line.text[1] == SCRIPT