Showing 13 of 13 total issues
Method parse_options
has 70 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_options
begin
opts = OptionParser.new do |opt|
opt.banner = "#{Kekkan::APP_NAME} v#{Kekkan::VERSION}\nJacob Hammack\n#{Kekkan::SITE}\n\n"
opt.banner << "Usage: #{Kekkan::APP_NAME} [options] [files_to_parse]"
Method parse_options
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_options
begin
opts = OptionParser.new do |opt|
opt.banner = "#{Kekkan::APP_NAME} v#{Kekkan::VERSION}\nJacob Hammack\n#{Kekkan::SITE}\n\n"
opt.banner << "Usage: #{Kekkan::APP_NAME} [options] [files_to_parse]"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method up
has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.up
create_table :entries do |t|
t.string :cve
t.string :published_datetime
t.string :last_modified_datetime
Method start_element
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def start_element(element, attributes = [])
@tag = element
@vals[@tag] = ""
if !@valid_elements.include?(element)
Method end_element
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def end_element(element)
#puts "End element: #{element}"
@tag = nil
case element
when "vuln:cve-id"
Method run
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def run
parse_options
if @options[:debug]
puts "[*] Enabling Debug Mode"
Method migrate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def migrate direction
begin
if @database["adapter"] == nil
return false, "[!] Invalid database adapter, please check your configuration file"
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method migrate
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def migrate direction
begin
if @database["adapter"] == nil
return false, "[!] Invalid database adapter, please check your configuration file"
end
Method run
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def run
parse_options
if @options[:debug]
puts "[*] Enabling Debug Mode"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method load_config
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def load_config file=CONFIG_FILE, memory_config=false
if File.exists?(file) == true or memory_config == true
begin
if memory_config
yaml = YAML::load(file)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method db_connect
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def db_connect
begin
if @database["adapter"] == nil
puts "[!] #{@database['adapter']}" if @options[:debug]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
when "vuln:definition"
@scanner = @entry.scanners.create
@scanner.attributes = {
:name => Hash[attributes]["name"],
:href => Hash[attributes]["href"],
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 30.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
when "vuln:assessment_check "
@ass = @entry.assessment_check.create
@ass.attributes = {
:name => Hash[attributes]["name"],
:href => Hash[attributes]["href"],
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 30.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76