Showing 19 of 19 total issues
File index.js
has 602 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
'use strict';
const fs = require('fs');
const path = require('path');
const { spawn } = require('child_process');
Function unarchive_recursive
has 184 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.unarchive_recursive = async function (
connection,
f,
archive_file_name,
cb,
Function unarchive_recursive
has a Cognitive Complexity of 34 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.unarchive_recursive = async function (
connection,
f,
archive_file_name,
cb,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function start_attachment
has 89 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.start_attachment = function (
connection,
ctype,
filename,
body,
Function check_attachments
has 73 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.check_attachments = function (next, connection) {
const txn = connection?.transaction;
if (!txn) return next();
// Check for any stored errors from the attachment hooks
Function check_attachments
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.check_attachments = function (next, connection) {
const txn = connection?.transaction;
if (!txn) return next();
// Check for any stored errors from the attachment hooks
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function timeoutedSpawn
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function timeoutedSpawn(cmd_path, args, env, pipe_stdout_ws) {
connection.logdebug(plugin, `running "${cmd_path} ${args.join(' ')}"`);
return new Promise(function (resolve, reject) {
let output = '';
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (ctypes_result) {
connection.loginfo(
this,
`match ctype="${ctypes_result[0]}" regexp=/${ctypes_result[1]}/`,
);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (archives_result) {
connection.loginfo(
this,
`match file="${archives_result[0]}" regexp=/${archives_result[1]}/`,
);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (files_result) {
connection.loginfo(
this,
`match file="${files_result[0]}" regexp=/${files_result[1]}/`,
);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function load_attachment_ini
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.load_attachment_ini = function () {
const plugin = this;
plugin.cfg = plugin.config.get('attachment.ini', () => {
plugin.load_attachment_ini();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function compute_and_log_md5sum
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.compute_and_log_md5sum = function (
connection,
ctype,
filename,
stream,
Function unpackArchive
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async function unpackArchive(in_file, file) {
const t = await createTmp();
tmpfiles.push([t.fd, t.name]);
connection.logdebug(
Function listFiles
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async function listFiles(in_file, prefix, depth) {
const result = [];
depth = depth || 0;
if (timeouted) {
Function check_items_against_regexps
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.check_items_against_regexps = function (items, regexps) {
if (!Array.isArray(regexps) || !Array.isArray(items)) return false;
if (!regexps?.length || !items?.length) return false;
for (let r = 0; r < regexps.length; r++) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function start_attachment
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
connection,
ctype,
filename,
body,
stream,
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return next(
DENY,
`Message contains unacceptable attachment (${files_result[0]})`,
);
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return next(
DENY,
`Message contains unacceptable attachment (${archives_result[0]})`,
);
Function start_attachment
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.start_attachment = function (
connection,
ctype,
filename,
body,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"