hardpixel/marv

Class `Global` has 38 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  class Global

    attr_accessor :config, :path, :servers, :plugins, :themes, :layouts

    def initialize(task, from_command=false)

Found in lib/marv/global.rb - About 5 hrs to fix

Class `Server` has 27 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    class Server

      attr_accessor :task, :name, :path, :config, :host, :port, :database, :context

      # Initialize server config

Found in lib/marv/server/server.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

File `global.rb` has 254 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

module Marv
  class Global

    attr_accessor :config, :path, :servers, :plugins, :themes, :layouts

Found in lib/marv/global.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      def ask_database_details
        options = {}
        options[:db_user] = @task.ask_input "MySQL database username:", :default => @global.config[:db_user]
        options[:db_password] = @task.ask_input "MySQL database password:", :default => @global.config[:db_password]
        options[:db_host] = @task.ask_input "MySQL database host:", :default => @global.config[:db_host]

Found in lib/marv/server/server.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix

Read up
Read up

lib/marv/project/create.rb on lines 48..56

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 54.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      def ask_author_details
        options = {}

        options[:author] = @task.ask_input "Enter project author:", :default => @global.config[:author]
        options[:author_uri] = @task.ask_input "Enter project author URI:", :default => @global.config[:author_uri]

Found in lib/marv/project/create.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix

Read up
Read up

lib/marv/server/server.rb on lines 127..134

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 54.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76

Method `init_sprockets` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def init_sprockets
        if ExecJS::Runtimes.runtimes.none?(&:available?)
          @task.say_error "No execjs runtime found! Aborting..."
          abort
        end

Found in lib/marv/project/builder/assets.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Method `project_contents` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def self.project_contents
        assets_path = @project.assets_path.gsub(/#{@project.root}\//, '')
        source_path = @project.source_path.gsub(/#{@project.root}\//, '')
        config_file = @project.config_file.gsub(/#{@project.root}\//, '')

Found in lib/marv/project/guard.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Method `list` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def list(dir='all')
        servers = Marv::Global.new(self).servers

        if dir == 'all'
          say_info "Available marv servers:", true

Found in lib/marv/cli/server.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Method `list` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def list(dir='all')
        servers = Marv::Global.new(self).servers

        if dir == 'all'
          say_info "Available marv servers:", true

Found in lib/marv/cli/server.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Read up
Read up

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method `create_project_dirs` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def create_project_dirs
        ::Dir.glob(::File.join(@layout, '**', '*')).each do |dir|
          if ::File.directory?(dir)
            # Get source and target files
            source_dir = dir.gsub(@layout, '')

Found in lib/marv/project/create.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Read up
Read up

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method `init_sprockets` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def init_sprockets
        if ExecJS::Runtimes.runtimes.none?(&:available?)
          @task.say_error "No execjs runtime found! Aborting..."
          abort
        end

Found in lib/marv/project/builder/assets.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Read up
Read up

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method `link_target` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def link_target
        target = link_to_server unless link_to_server.nil?
        target = link_to_folder unless link_to_folder.nil?
        target = link_global unless link_global.nil?

Found in lib/marv/project/actions.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Read up
Read up

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method `stop` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def stop(message=true)
        abort_noexist
        pid_file = ::File.join(@path, 'php.pid')

        begin

Found in lib/marv/server/actions.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Read up
Read up

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method `build_asset_file` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def build_asset_file(asset)
        destination = ::File.join(@project.build_path, asset)

        @task.shell.mute do
          sprocket = @sprockets.find_asset(asset.last)

Found in lib/marv/project/builder/assets.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Read up
Read up

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method `generate_config` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def generate_config(from_command=false)
      if from_command
        ::File.exists?(config_file) ? reconfigure : configure(from_command)
      else
        configure unless ::File.exists?(config_file)

Found in lib/marv/global.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Read up
Read up

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method `_prompt` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def _prompt(ending_char)
        proc do |target_self, nest_level, pry|
          history    = pry.input_ring.size
          process    = ::Guard.listener.paused? ? _colorize("pause", :yellow) : _colorize("marv", :green)
          level      = ":#{nest_level}" unless nest_level.zero?

Found in lib/marv/project/guard/pry.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Read up
Read up

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method `stop` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def stop(dir)
        unless dir == 'all'
          server = Marv::Server::Server.new(self, dir)
          action = Marv::Server::Actions.new(server)
          action.stop

Found in lib/marv/cli/server.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Read up
Read up

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading