Showing 242 of 242 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
params do
requires :id, type: Integer, desc: "The ID of the forum you are updating"
requires :name, type: String, desc: "The name of the forum"
requires :description, type: String, desc: "The description of the forum"
optional :allow_post_voting, type: Boolean, desc: "Should topic replies be voteable?"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 45.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method update
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update
@user = User.find(params[:id])
fetch_counts
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
params do
requires :topic_id, type: Integer, desc: "Topic to add post to"
requires :body, type: String, desc: "The post body"
requires :user_id, type: Integer, desc: "The User ID of the poster"
requires :kind, type: String, desc: "The kind of post, either 'reply' or 'note'"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 45.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var $widgetIframe = $('<iframe>', {
src: helpyDomain + "/widget",
id: 'widget-frame',
frameborder: 0,
//height: 380,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 53.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var $widgetIframe = $('<iframe>', {
src: helpyDomain + "/widget",
id: 'widget-frame',
frameborder: 0,
//height: 380,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 53.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Code Injection vulnerability in CarrierWave::RMagick Open
carrierwave (1.3.1)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2021-21305
Criticality: High
URL: https://github.com/carrierwaveuploader/carrierwave/security/advisories/GHSA-cf3w-g86h-35x4
Solution: upgrade to ~> 1.3.2, >= 2.1.1
Improper Certificate Validation in oauth ruby gem Open
oauth (0.5.4)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2016-11086
Criticality: High
URL: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-7359-3c6r-hfc2
Solution: upgrade to >= 0.5.5
Server-side request forgery in CarrierWave Open
carrierwave (1.3.1)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2021-21288
Criticality: Medium
URL: https://github.com/carrierwaveuploader/carrierwave/security/advisories/GHSA-fwcm-636p-68r5
Solution: upgrade to ~> 1.3.2, >= 2.1.1
TZInfo relative path traversal vulnerability allows loading of arbitrary files Open
tzinfo (1.2.7)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2022-31163
Criticality: High
URL: https://github.com/tzinfo/tzinfo/security/advisories/GHSA-5cm2-9h8c-rvfx
Solution: upgrade to ~> 0.3.61, >= 1.2.10
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request Smuggling') in puma Open
puma (5.5.0)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2021-41136
Criticality: Low
URL: https://github.com/puma/puma/security/advisories/GHSA-48w2-rm65-62xx
Solution: upgrade to ~> 4.3.9, >= 5.5.1
OmniAuth's lib/omniauth/failure_endpoint.rb
does not escape message_key
value Open
omniauth (1.9.1)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2020-36599
Criticality: Critical
Solution: upgrade to ~> 1.9.2, >= 2.0.0
XML round-trip vulnerability in REXML Open
rexml (3.2.4)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2021-28965
Criticality: High
URL: https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2021/04/05/xml-round-trip-vulnerability-in-rexml-cve-2021-28965/
Solution: upgrade to ~> 3.1.9.1, ~> 3.2.3.1, >= 3.2.5
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
title: permitted_params[:title],
category_id: permitted_params[:category_id],
body: permitted_params[:body],
user_id: permitted_params[:user_id],
keywords: permitted_params[:keywords],
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 41.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
title: permitted_params[:title],
category_id: permitted_params[:category_id],
body: permitted_params[:body],
user_id: permitted_params[:user_id],
keywords: permitted_params[:keywords],
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 41.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method perform
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def perform(category, action, label, value, client_id, ga_id)
Method update_topic
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_topic
bulk_post_attributes = []
if params[:change_status].present?
user_id = current_user.id || 2
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method index
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def index
@forum = Forum.ispublic.where(id: params[:forum_id]).first
if @forum
if @forum.allow_topic_voting == true
@topics = @forum.topics.ispublic.by_popularity.page(params[:page]).per(15)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method import
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def import(file_path, file_name, klass, user, import)
Method navbar_expanding_link
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def navbar_expanding_link(url, icon, text, target="", remote=false)
Method upper_nav_item
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def upper_nav_item(label, path, controllers, actions, icon="")