Showing 24 of 24 total issues
Method val_to_str has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def val_to_str(val)
if val.nil?
'nil'
elsif val.is_a?(TrueClass)
'true'- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_option_with_param has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_option_with_param(options, opts, names, opt_name, settings = {})
opts.on(*names, settings[:type] || String) { |param|
if settings[:append]
options[opt_name] << param
else- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method param_option_name_mod has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def param_option_name_mod(names, settings)
names[0] << ' PARAM' unless names.any? { |v| v.include?(' ') }
names = settings.has_key?(:desc) ? (names + [settings[:desc]]) : names
settings.has_key?(:type) ? (names + [settings[:type]]) : names
end- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method param_option_value_determine has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def param_option_value_determine(current_value, new_value, settings)
settings[:append] ? (current_value + new_value) : ((new_value.nil? || new_value == '') ? current_value : new_value)
end- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"