Sign upLogin

henrikrudstrom/oce-wrap

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 52 of 52 total issues

Function nativeToArray has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

function nativeToArray(input, output, getSize, content, byVal) {
Severity: Minor
Found in src/features/collection.js - About 35 mins to fix

    Function withAccessor has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    function withAccessor(input, output, native, wrapped, getter) {
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/features/memberObjectTypemap.js - About 35 mins to fix

      Avoid too many return statements within this function.
      Open

        return {
    // use typemap convertion template
    expr: 'value',
    statements: 'v8::Handle<v8::Value> value;\n  ' + render.toWrapped(arg, 'value', '$1') + '\n'
  };
      Severity: Major
      Found in src/features/argout.js - About 30 mins to fix

        Avoid too many return statements within this function.
        Open

          return `create.${mod}.${type}()`;
        Severity: Major
        Found in src/testLib.js - About 30 mins to fix

          Avoid too many return statements within this function.
          Open

              return res;
          Severity: Major
          Found in src/dependencies.js - About 30 mins to fix

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

              {
    name: 'moduleIncludes',
    src: decl.moduleDepends.map(
      (modName) => `%include "../${modName}/headers.i"`
    ).join('\n')
            Severity: Minor
            Found in src/features/depends.js and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
            src/features/depends.js on lines 15..20

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 45.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Avoid too many return statements within this function.
            Open

              return false;
            Severity: Major
            Found in src/features/rename.js - About 30 mins to fix

              Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

                return [{
    name: 'moduleDepends',
    src: decl.moduleDepends.map(
      (modName) => `%import "../${modName}/module.i"`
    ).join('\n')
              Severity: Minor
              Found in src/features/depends.js and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
              src/features/depends.js on lines 21..26

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 45.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              Function include has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

                include(expr) {
    if (Array.isArray(expr)) expr.map(this.include.bind(this));

    if (typeof expr !== 'function')
      if (this.declType && (this.declType === 'class' || this.declType === 'enum' || this.declType === 'typedef'))
              Severity: Minor
              Found in src/conf.js - About 25 mins to fix

              Cognitive Complexity

              Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

              A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

              • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
              • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
              • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

              Further reading

              Function renderRename has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

              function renderRename(decl, parts) {
  if (decl.declType === 'module' && parts.get('renames.i') !== '') {
    return {
      name: 'featureIncludes',
      src: '%include "renames.i";'
              Severity: Minor
              Found in src/features/rename.js - About 25 mins to fix

              Cognitive Complexity

              Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

              A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

              • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
              • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
              • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

              Further reading

              Function renderModuleSwig has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

              function renderModuleSwig(decl, parts) {
  if (decl.declType !== 'module')
    return false;

  function includeIfExists(name) {
              Severity: Minor
              Found in src/features/module.js - About 25 mins to fix

              Cognitive Complexity

              Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

              A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

              • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
              • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
              • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

              Further reading

              Function renderMemberFunction has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

              function renderMemberFunction(decl) {
  if (decl.declType !== 'constructor' && decl.declType !== 'memfun' || decl.custom)
    return false;

  var indexes = decl.argouts ? decl.argouts.map(argout => argout.index) : [];
              Severity: Minor
              Found in src/features/memberFunction.js - About 25 mins to fix

              Cognitive Complexity

              Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

              A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

              • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
              • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
              • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

              Further reading

              Severity
              Category
              Status
              Source
              Language