Showing 33 of 33 total issues
Method bulk
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def bulk(params_key = controller_name, &block)
@bulk_success = []
@bulk_errors = []
entries = params[params_key]
entries = entries.to_unsafe_h if Rails::VERSION::MAJOR >= 5 && entries.instance_of?(ActionController::Parameters)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method stop
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def stop
stop = Time.now.change(sec: 0) + 1.minute
time_log = nil
transaction(requires_new: true) do
if start < stop
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method chart_data
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def chart_data(chart_query)
data = Hash.new([].freeze)
ticks = []
tooltips = Hash.new([].freeze)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method update_query_from_params
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_query_from_params
@query.project = params[:query_is_for_all] ? nil : @project
@query.build_from_params(params)
@query.column_names = nil if params[:default_columns]
@query.sort_criteria = (params[:query] && params[:query][:sort_criteria]) || @query.sort_criteria
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method split
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def split(args)
split_at = args[:split_at].change(sec: 0)
insert_new_before, round = args.values_at :insert_new_before, :round
return if start >= split_at || split_at >= stop
old_time = insert_new_before ? start : stop
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_assign_params
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_assign_params(new_settings = nil, options = nil, key = nil)
key, options = [options, nil] if key == nil && options.is_a?(Symbol)
new_settings = {"#{key}".to_sym => new_settings} if key.is_a?(Symbol)
project = options[:project] if options.is_a? Hash
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method find_gaps
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find_gaps(bookings, start, stop)
sorted = bookings.sort_by { |booking| booking.start }
gaps = []
unless sorted.first.start == start
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method bulk_create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def bulk_create
bulk do |_, params|
result = nil
ActiveRecord::Base.transaction do
result = Hourglass::TimeLog.create create_time_log_params params
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method update_following_bookings
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_following_bookings(user, project_id, current_booking)
booking = current_booking
current_time_log = current_booking.time_log
start = current_time_log.start
loop do
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method stop
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def stop
time_tracker = authorize get_time_tracker
time_log, time_booking = time_tracker.transaction do
time_log = time_tracker.stop
authorize time_log, :booking_allowed? if time_log && time_tracker.project
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sql_for_field
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sql_for_field(field, operator, value, db_table, db_field, is_custom_filter=false)
Method join
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def join
authorize Hourglass::TimeLog
ids = params[:ids].uniq
time_logs = Hourglass::TimeLog.where(id: ids).order start: :asc
raise ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound if time_logs.length != ids.length
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def available_columns
@available_columns ||= self.class.available_columns.dup.tap do |available_columns|
{
time_entry: TimeEntryCustomField,
issue: issue_custom_fields,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 37.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def available_columns
@available_columns ||= self.class.available_columns.dup.tap do |available_columns|
{
time_entry: TimeEntryCustomField,
issue: issue_custom_fields,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 37.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method change?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def change?(param = nil)
condition = param ? protected_parameters.include?(param) : unsafe_attributes?
if condition
update_all_forbidden_message and return false unless authorized? :change_all
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method init
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def init
now = Time.now.change sec: 0
self.user ||= User.current
previous_time_log = user.hourglass_time_logs.find_by(stop: now + 1.minute)
self.project_id ||= issue && issue.project_id
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_user_filter
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_user_filter
principals = []
if project
principals += project.principals.visible.sort
unless project.leaf?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method totals_sum
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def totals_sum(query)
if query.grouped?
query.totals_by_group.each_with_object(query.totalable_columns.map { |column| [column, 0.00] }.to_h) do |(_, totals), sum|
transform_totals(totals).each do |column, total|
sum[column] += total
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create
time_log, time_booking = nil
ActiveRecord::Base.transaction do
time_log = Hourglass::TimeLog.create create_time_log_params
raise ActiveRecord::Rollback unless time_log.persisted?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method booking_process
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def booking_process(user, options)
round = round?(options)
if round
previous_time_log = closest_booked_time_log user, options[:project_id], options[:start], after_current: false
options[:start], options[:stop] = calculate_bookable_time options[:start], options[:stop], previous_time_log && previous_time_log.time_booking && previous_time_log.time_booking.rounding_carry_over, project: options[:project_id]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"