holgern/beem

View on GitHub
beem/price.py

Summary

Maintainability
F
1 wk
Test Coverage
B
84%

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __init__. (36)
Open

    def __init__(
        self,
        price=None,
        base=None,
        quote=None,
Severity: Minor
Found in beem/price.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

File price.py has 441 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
from beemgraphenebase.py23 import bytes_types, integer_types, string_types, text_type
from fractions import Fraction
from beem.instance import shared_blockchain_instance
from .exceptions import InvalidAssetException
Severity: Minor
Found in beem/price.py - About 6 hrs to fix

    Consider simplifying this complex logical expression.
    Open

            if (price is not None and isinstance(price, string_types) and not base and not quote):
                import re
                price, assets = price.split(" ")
                base_symbol, quote_symbol = assets_from_string(assets)
                base = Asset(base_symbol, blockchain_instance=self.blockchain)
    Severity: Critical
    Found in beem/price.py - About 5 hrs to fix

      Function __init__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def __init__(
              self,
              price=None,
              base=None,
              quote=None,
      Severity: Minor
      Found in beem/price.py - About 3 hrs to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Price has 25 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      class Price(dict):
          """ This class deals with all sorts of prices of any pair of assets to
              simplify dealing with the tuple::
      
                  (quote, base)
      Severity: Minor
      Found in beem/price.py - About 2 hrs to fix

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __repr__. (11)
        Open

            def __repr__(self):
                if "deleted" in self and self["deleted"]:
                    return "deleted order %s" % self["id"]
                else:
                    t = ""
        Severity: Minor
        Found in beem/price.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in class Order. (10)
        Open

        class Order(Price):
            """ This class inherits :class:`beem.price.Price` but has the ``base``
                and ``quote`` Amounts not only be used to represent the price (as a
                ratio of base and quote) but instead has those amounts represent the
                amounts of an actual order!
        Severity: Minor
        Found in beem/price.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __init__. (9)
        Open

            def __init__(self, base, quote=None, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
        
                self.blockchain = blockchain_instance or shared_blockchain_instance()
        
                if (
        Severity: Minor
        Found in beem/price.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __repr__. (9)
        Open

            def __repr__(self):
                t = ""
                if "date" in self and self["date"]:
                    t += "(%s) " % self["date"]
                if "type" in self and self["type"]:
        Severity: Minor
        Found in beem/price.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __init__. (7)
        Open

            def __init__(self, order, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
        
                self.blockchain = blockchain_instance or shared_blockchain_instance()
                if isinstance(order, dict) and "current_pays" in order and "open_pays" in order:
                    # filled orders from account history
        Severity: Minor
        Found in beem/price.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function check_asset. (7)
        Open

        def check_asset(other, self, stm):
            if isinstance(other, dict) and "asset" in other and isinstance(self, dict) and "asset" in self:
                if not Asset(other["asset"], blockchain_instance=stm) == Asset(self["asset"], blockchain_instance=stm):
                    raise AssertionError()
            else:
        Severity: Minor
        Found in beem/price.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __mul__. (7)
        Open

            def __mul__(self, other):
                a = self.copy()
                if isinstance(other, Price):
                    # Rotate/invert other
                    if (
        Severity: Minor
        Found in beem/price.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __div__. (6)
        Open

            def __div__(self, other):
                a = self.copy()
                if isinstance(other, Price):
                    # Rotate/invert other
                    if sorted(self.symbols()) == sorted(other.symbols()):
        Severity: Minor
        Found in beem/price.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Cyclomatic complexity is too high in class FilledOrder. (6)
        Open

        class FilledOrder(Price):
            """ This class inherits :class:`beem.price.Price` but has the ``base``
                and ``quote`` Amounts not only be used to represent the price (as a
                ratio of base and quote) but instead has those amounts represent the
                amounts of an actually filled order!
        Severity: Minor
        Found in beem/price.py by radon

        Cyclomatic Complexity

        Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

        Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

        Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
        if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
        elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
        else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
        for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
        while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
        except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
        finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
        with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
        assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
        Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
        Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

        Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

        Function __mul__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def __mul__(self, other):
                a = self.copy()
                if isinstance(other, Price):
                    # Rotate/invert other
                    if (
        Severity: Minor
        Found in beem/price.py - About 1 hr to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Function __repr__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def __repr__(self):
                if "deleted" in self and self["deleted"]:
                    return "deleted order %s" % self["id"]
                else:
                    t = ""
        Severity: Minor
        Found in beem/price.py - About 1 hr to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Function __init__ has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def __init__(
        Severity: Major
        Found in beem/price.py - About 50 mins to fix

          Function __init__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              def __init__(self, order, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
          
                  self.blockchain = blockchain_instance or shared_blockchain_instance()
                  if isinstance(order, dict) and "current_pays" in order and "open_pays" in order:
                      # filled orders from account history
          Severity: Minor
          Found in beem/price.py - About 45 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Function __div__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              def __div__(self, other):
                  a = self.copy()
                  if isinstance(other, Price):
                      # Rotate/invert other
                      if sorted(self.symbols()) == sorted(other.symbols()):
          Severity: Minor
          Found in beem/price.py - About 45 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Function check_asset has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

          def check_asset(other, self, stm):
              if isinstance(other, dict) and "asset" in other and isinstance(self, dict) and "asset" in self:
                  if not Asset(other["asset"], blockchain_instance=stm) == Asset(self["asset"], blockchain_instance=stm):
                      raise AssertionError()
              else:
          Severity: Minor
          Found in beem/price.py - About 35 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Function __init__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              def __init__(self, base, quote=None, blockchain_instance=None, **kwargs):
          
                  self.blockchain = blockchain_instance or shared_blockchain_instance()
          
                  if (
          Severity: Minor
          Found in beem/price.py - About 25 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 28 to the 15 allowed.
          Open

              def __init__(
          Severity: Critical
          Found in beem/price.py by sonar-python

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.

          See

          Remove this commented out code.
          Open

                      # base/quote = a/b
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/price.py by sonar-python

          Programmers should not comment out code as it bloats programs and reduces readability.

          Unused code should be deleted and can be retrieved from source control history if required.

          See

          • MISRA C:2004, 2.4 - Sections of code should not be "commented out".
          • MISRA C++:2008, 2-7-2 - Sections of code shall not be "commented out" using C-style comments.
          • MISRA C++:2008, 2-7-3 - Sections of code should not be "commented out" using C++ comments.
          • MISRA C:2012, Dir. 4.4 - Sections of code should not be "commented out"

          Remove this commented out code.
          Open

                      # a/b * c/a =  c/b
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/price.py by sonar-python

          Programmers should not comment out code as it bloats programs and reduces readability.

          Unused code should be deleted and can be retrieved from source control history if required.

          See

          • MISRA C:2004, 2.4 - Sections of code should not be "commented out".
          • MISRA C++:2008, 2-7-2 - Sections of code shall not be "commented out" using C-style comments.
          • MISRA C++:2008, 2-7-3 - Sections of code should not be "commented out" using C++ comments.
          • MISRA C:2012, Dir. 4.4 - Sections of code should not be "commented out"

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      elif self["base"]["symbol"] == other["quote"]["symbol"]:
                          a["base"] = Amount(
                              float(self["base"]) * float(other["base"]), other["base"]["symbol"],
                              blockchain_instance=self.blockchain
                          )
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/price.py and 1 other location - About 7 hrs to fix
          beem/price.py on lines 285..292

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 121.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      if self["quote"]["symbol"] == other["base"]["symbol"]:
                          a["base"] = Amount(
                              float(self["base"]) * float(other["base"]), self["base"]["symbol"],
                              blockchain_instance=self.blockchain
                          )
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/price.py and 1 other location - About 7 hrs to fix
          beem/price.py on lines 295..302

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 121.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

          def check_asset(other, self, stm):
              if isinstance(other, dict) and "asset" in other and isinstance(self, dict) and "asset" in self:
                  if not Asset(other["asset"], blockchain_instance=stm) == Asset(self["asset"], blockchain_instance=stm):
                      raise AssertionError()
              else:
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/price.py and 1 other location - About 6 hrs to fix
          beem/amount.py on lines 8..14

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 108.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

              def as_quote(self, quote):
                  """ Returns the price instance so that the quote asset is ``quote``.
          
                      .. note:: This makes a copy of the object!
          
          
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/price.py and 1 other location - About 4 hrs to fix
          beem/price.py on lines 187..206

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 77.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

              def as_base(self, base):
                  """ Returns the price instance so that the base asset is ``base``.
          
                      .. note:: This makes a copy of the object!
          
          
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/price.py and 1 other location - About 4 hrs to fix
          beem/price.py on lines 208..227

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 77.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      a["quote"] = Amount(
                          float(self["quote"].amount / other["quote"].amount), self["quote"]["symbol"],
                          blockchain_instance=self.blockchain
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/price.py and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
          beem/price.py on lines 336..338

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 60.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      a["base"] = Amount(
                          float(self["base"].amount / other["base"].amount), other["quote"]["symbol"],
                          blockchain_instance=self.blockchain
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/price.py and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
          beem/price.py on lines 340..342

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 60.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      super(Order, self).__init__(
                          Amount(base["min_to_receive"], blockchain_instance=self.blockchain),
                          Amount(base["amount_to_sell"], blockchain_instance=self.blockchain),
                          blockchain_instance=self.blockchain
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/price.py and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
          beem/price.py on lines 509..512

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 53.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      super(FilledOrder, self).__init__(
                          Amount(order["open_pays"], blockchain_instance=self.blockchain),
                          Amount(order["current_pays"], blockchain_instance=self.blockchain),
                          blockchain_instance=self.blockchain
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/price.py and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
          beem/price.py on lines 459..462

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 53.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  if "base" in self and self["base"]:
                      t += "%s " % str(self["base"])
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/price.py and 5 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
          beem/price.py on lines 478..479
          beem/price.py on lines 480..481
          beem/price.py on lines 482..483
          beem/price.py on lines 531..532
          beem/price.py on lines 533..534

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 44.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      if "base" in self and self["base"]:
                          t += "%s " % str(self["base"])
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/price.py and 5 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
          beem/price.py on lines 478..479
          beem/price.py on lines 480..481
          beem/price.py on lines 531..532
          beem/price.py on lines 533..534
          beem/price.py on lines 535..536

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 44.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  if "quote" in self and self["quote"]:
                      t += "%s " % str(self["quote"])
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/price.py and 5 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
          beem/price.py on lines 478..479
          beem/price.py on lines 480..481
          beem/price.py on lines 482..483
          beem/price.py on lines 531..532
          beem/price.py on lines 535..536

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 44.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      if "type" in self and self["type"]:
                          t += "%s " % str(self["type"])
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/price.py and 5 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
          beem/price.py on lines 480..481
          beem/price.py on lines 482..483
          beem/price.py on lines 531..532
          beem/price.py on lines 533..534
          beem/price.py on lines 535..536

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 44.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  if "type" in self and self["type"]:
                      t += "%s " % str(self["type"])
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/price.py and 5 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
          beem/price.py on lines 478..479
          beem/price.py on lines 480..481
          beem/price.py on lines 482..483
          beem/price.py on lines 533..534
          beem/price.py on lines 535..536

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 44.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      if "quote" in self and self["quote"]:
                          t += "%s " % str(self["quote"])
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/price.py and 5 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
          beem/price.py on lines 478..479
          beem/price.py on lines 482..483
          beem/price.py on lines 531..532
          beem/price.py on lines 533..534
          beem/price.py on lines 535..536

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 44.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  elif (price is None and isinstance(base, string_types) and isinstance(quote, string_types)):
                      self["quote"] = Amount(quote, blockchain_instance=self.blockchain)
                      self["base"] = Amount(base, blockchain_instance=self.blockchain)
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/price.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
          beem/price.py on lines 136..138

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 43.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  if not other["base"]["symbol"] == self["base"]["symbol"]:
                      raise AssertionError()
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/price.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
          beem/price.py on lines 269..270

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 43.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  elif (price is not None and isinstance(price, string_types) and isinstance(base, string_types)):
                      self["quote"] = Amount(price, blockchain_instance=self.blockchain)
                      self["base"] = Amount(base, blockchain_instance=self.blockchain)
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/price.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
          beem/price.py on lines 133..135

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 43.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  if not other["quote"]["symbol"] == self["quote"]["symbol"]:
                      raise AssertionError()
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/price.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
          beem/price.py on lines 267..268

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 43.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      if "time" in self and self["time"]:
                          t += "(%s) " % self["time"]
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/price.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
          beem/price.py on lines 529..530

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 40.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  if "date" in self and self["date"]:
                      t += "(%s) " % self["date"]
          Severity: Major
          Found in beem/price.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
          beem/price.py on lines 476..477

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 40.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          There are no issues that match your filters.

          Category
          Status