Showing 6 of 6 total issues
Method has_versions
has a Cognitive Complexity of 34 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def has_versions(options = {})
options[:also_include] ||= {}
options[:skip] ||= []
options[:skip] += options[:also_include].keys
if respond_to?(:translated_attrs)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method has_versions
has 61 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def has_versions(options = {})
options[:also_include] ||= {}
options[:skip] ||= []
options[:skip] += options[:also_include].keys
if respond_to?(:translated_attrs)
Method diff
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def diff(other_snapshot)
keys = (self.keys + other_snapshot.keys).uniq
keys.each_with_object({}) do |key, diff|
old_value = self[key]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method materialize_item
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def materialize_item(klass, attr, value)
if (association = klass.reflect_on_all_associations.find { |a| [a.foreign_key, a.plural_name, a.name.to_s].include?(attr) })
# attr is association in klass
if value.is_a?(Hash)
if value.size == 1 && value.keys.first.to_s == association.klass.primary_key.to_s
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method pretty_version_attribute_value
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def pretty_version_attribute_value(attr, value)
case value
when Array
Arbre::Context.new(context: self) do
text_node attr.humanize.singularize
Method versions_diff_classes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def versions_diff_classes(removed, added)
if (added.present? && removed.present?) || (BOOLEAN_VALUES.include?(added) && BOOLEAN_VALUES.include?(removed))
old_class = 'changed'
new_class = old_class
elsif added.present? || BOOLEAN_VALUES.include?(added)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"