Method service.RequirePermissionEqualOrHigher
has 7 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (s *service) RequirePermissionEqualOrHigher(ctx context.Context, role,
resourceType string, resourceID uint) error {
currentUser, err := common.UserFromContext(ctx)
if err != nil {
return err
Method service.UpdateMember
has 7 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (s *service) UpdateMember(ctx context.Context, memberID uint, role string) (*models.Member, error) {
// 1. get the member
memberItem, err := s.memberManager.GetByID(ctx, memberID)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
Method service.CreateMember
has 6 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (s *service) CreateMember(ctx context.Context, postMember PostMember) (*models.Member, error) {
var currentUser userauth.User
currentUser, err := common.UserFromContext(ctx)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
Method service.RemoveMember
has 6 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (s *service) RemoveMember(ctx context.Context, memberID uint) error {
// 1. get member
memberItem, err := s.memberManager.GetByID(ctx, memberID)
if err != nil {
return err
Method service.getMember
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (s *service) getMember(ctx context.Context, resourceType string, resourceID uint,
memberType models.MemberType, memberInfo uint) (*models.Member, error) {
Method service.listGroupMembers
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (s *service) listGroupMembers(ctx context.Context, resourceID uint) ([]models.Member, error) {
var (
retMembers []models.Member
members []models.Member
err error
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (s *service) listTemplateMembers(ctx context.Context, resourceID uint) ([]models.Member, error) {
var (
retMembers []models.Member
members []models.Member
err error
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 310.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (s *service) listApplicationMembers(ctx context.Context, resourceID uint) ([]models.Member, error) {
var (
retMembers []models.Member
members []models.Member
err error
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 310.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76